29-02-2016, 02:16 PM
(This post was last modified: 14-06-2016, 11:14 AM by Davidsch.
Edit Reason: removed link to research which i removed
)
Quote:rene
Just imagine that Eva-k and Eva-t were one and the same character, but not written very consistently. The scribe could have decided that these were two different ones, and always wrote it clearly as one or the other.
D'Imperio makes a point about this: they do appear to be written clearly as one or the other, yet in the 4 times repeating 17-character sequence there is one character which is written twice with the extra 'hook' and twice without, as if they are equivalent.
Aha, Rene, i did not know that. myself, i came to the conclusion that p=f=p is the only possible replacement, based on my letter-word-analysis.
Based on that, i am very confident and sure that t is not k is not t