Rene, we are still talking about two different things, as I tried to explain in my previous posts here.
When we ask "can we call this a Zodiac", the question is about terminology. And as I showed in my first post of this thread, there are definitions of what "a Zodiac" is: one circular or elliptical diagram with the signs. The VM section shows signs on separate pages, so there is simply no way it can be "a Zodiac", even if all the signs were proper, in the right order and the right amount.
It is "something else" using the signs of the Zodiac. Just like a horoscope is not "a Zodiac", it's a horoscope. It may contain a Zodiac diagram, or part of it, but the whole thing is not a Zodiac.
This is a Zodiac:
![[Image: 05e48aa1c1ccb955cce7161f715726ea--astrol...-signs.jpg]](https://i.pinimg.com/736x/05/e4/8a/05e48aa1c1ccb955cce7161f715726ea--astrology-chart-astrology-signs.jpg)
This image also contains a Zodiac:
![[Image: 20120220-Ptolemy_zodiac.jpg]](http://factsanddetails.com/media/2/20120220-Ptolemy_zodiac.jpg)
This one too:
![[Image: mithraic_relief_representing_hi.jpg]](https://www.art-prints-on-demand.com/kunst/roman/mithraic_relief_representing_hi.jpg)
The Voynich section most definitely does not contain a Zodiac, and it even more definitely is not a Zodiac. Both you and Diane keep mixing the discussion about the word Zodiac with the discussion about the Signs, but those are different things.
You won't get a series like this without connection to Zodiac imagery. But not everything which uses Zodiac signs is a Zodiac, while you keep saying that it is.
This discussion is almost surreal.
When we ask "can we call this a Zodiac", the question is about terminology. And as I showed in my first post of this thread, there are definitions of what "a Zodiac" is: one circular or elliptical diagram with the signs. The VM section shows signs on separate pages, so there is simply no way it can be "a Zodiac", even if all the signs were proper, in the right order and the right amount.
It is "something else" using the signs of the Zodiac. Just like a horoscope is not "a Zodiac", it's a horoscope. It may contain a Zodiac diagram, or part of it, but the whole thing is not a Zodiac.
This is a Zodiac:
![[Image: 05e48aa1c1ccb955cce7161f715726ea--astrol...-signs.jpg]](https://i.pinimg.com/736x/05/e4/8a/05e48aa1c1ccb955cce7161f715726ea--astrology-chart-astrology-signs.jpg)
This image also contains a Zodiac:
![[Image: 20120220-Ptolemy_zodiac.jpg]](http://factsanddetails.com/media/2/20120220-Ptolemy_zodiac.jpg)
This one too:
![[Image: mithraic_relief_representing_hi.jpg]](https://www.art-prints-on-demand.com/kunst/roman/mithraic_relief_representing_hi.jpg)
The Voynich section most definitely does not contain a Zodiac, and it even more definitely is not a Zodiac. Both you and Diane keep mixing the discussion about the word Zodiac with the discussion about the Signs, but those are different things.
You won't get a series like this without connection to Zodiac imagery. But not everything which uses Zodiac signs is a Zodiac, while you keep saying that it is.
This discussion is almost surreal.

