[Panel Session] Cryptologic History panel Oct. 19, 2017
#34
(19-11-2017, 08:14 PM)proto57 wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.And many of these points can be used for the converse, such as "Why the anatomically incorrect animals?", or "rare depictions" of the Zodiac, or whatever- well a genuine work can have them, but error, anomalies, are actually another red flag of forgery.


They are anatomically incorrect, or unusually expressed, in very specific ways that would not come into the mind of a forger or benefit a forger in any way.

Absolutely no one draws two crayfish for Cancer and it would take longer for a forger to add the extraneous one, more time and energy and less profit. You will have a very hard time convincing me that this specific kind of addition is a flag of forgery, especially when some of these additions are thematically consistent with one another.


There are other examples, but this gives the basic idea of what I mean.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: Cryptologic History panel Oct. 19, 2017 - by -JKP- - 20-11-2017, 09:21 AM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  [Talk] 04 June 2020 Talk on The History of the Book and the History of Cryptography arca_libraria 3 8,178 03-06-2020, 08:15 PM
Last Post: Emma May Smith
  [Conference] 2019 Symposium on Cryptologic History doranchak 6 10,290 30-09-2019, 11:58 PM
Last Post: -JKP-
  [Conference] Crypto history event in Bratislava in 2017: Voynich presentations welcome! kschmeh 11 17,323 13-04-2017, 06:16 PM
Last Post: Anton

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)