Plant Id.
#17
We pretty much have to compare it to older depictions because that's how people saw and did things at the time and the VMS illustrator didn't work in a vacuum. It's highly unlikely that the oak-and-ivy combination is a coincidence. It was part of herbal tradition.  (P.S., I use the term "oak" for convenience to mean oak-leaved plant. It wasn't always drawn as an oak. Some of the early versions of this combination look like they might be another plant with oak-like leaves).
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Plant Id. - by Dispator - 01-10-2017, 06:12 PM
RE: Plant Id. - by davidjackson - 01-10-2017, 07:31 PM
RE: Plant Id. - by Dispator - 01-10-2017, 08:19 PM
RE: Plant Id. - by -JKP- - 01-10-2017, 10:08 PM
RE: Plant Id. - by Dispator - 01-10-2017, 10:37 PM
RE: Plant Id. - by -JKP- - 01-10-2017, 11:10 PM
RE: Plant Id. - by Dispator - 01-10-2017, 11:25 PM
RE: Plant Id. - by -JKP- - 02-10-2017, 02:42 AM
RE: Plant Id. - by -JKP- - 02-10-2017, 03:07 AM
RE: Plant Id. - by Dispator - 02-10-2017, 09:54 AM
RE: Plant Id. - by -JKP- - 02-10-2017, 10:01 AM
RE: Plant Id. - by Dispator - 01-10-2017, 10:53 PM
RE: Plant Id. - by -JKP- - 01-10-2017, 11:04 PM
RE: Plant Id. - by MarcoP - 02-10-2017, 08:34 AM
RE: Plant Id. - by -JKP- - 02-10-2017, 09:56 AM
RE: Plant Id. - by Dispator - 02-10-2017, 10:10 AM
RE: Plant Id. - by -JKP- - 02-10-2017, 10:21 AM
RE: Plant Id. - by Anton - 02-10-2017, 10:48 AM
RE: Plant Id. - by Dispator - 02-10-2017, 11:25 AM
RE: Plant Id. - by -JKP- - 02-10-2017, 11:53 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)