Numbering Quire and pages

[Wladimir D]

In my opinion, the events developed as follows.
After writing the manuscript, he spent a long time (20-40 + years) lying scattered. This is evidenced by fouling of the f67r2 and ROS sheets (this can not happen in a stitched form, since the cover dimensions are always larger than the sheets).
Perhaps these long sheets were used to store other Quire (the folder for paper).
The owner of the archive decided to make a book, for which he collected the sheets in a notebook and made the Quire numbering. This happened in the period 1442 - 1505g, when for different purposes three types of numbering were used (Roman numerals and two variants of Arabic numerals).
The owner gives the Quires (notebooks) to the bookbinder,  that makes a mistake when stitching Quire 9.
After receiving the finished book, the owner wants to number the pages, and, reaching the page 67 he automatically makes an inscription in the upper right corner. But noticing that on this page there was a Quire 9 signature, he crossed out the first option 67  to talk with the bookbinder maker to correct the error.
   

 The process of Re-stitching is associated with damage to the cover, so the owner rejects this idea and writes again 67.
A hundred years later some numbers were damaged by the worm.   Post # 32-34 You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.

The first inscription 67 could have been washed (there are traces of the reagent on the reverse side, as on f1v) later, when the "signature" of Tepenec on the first page was washed away.