08-02-2016, 06:21 PM
Bravo MarcoP,
That's a great match. Spot on!, as they say. And to be honest, this one that you've demonstrated is all yours, The VMs pattern I'm recalling has more circles and no real outer boundary. So we can call this one Armille and still find Gurges as well - I hope.
The general pattern is often more important than the actual number of lines. The gurges pattern is not a specific number of lines. This applies even more so to the striped patterns like paly, bendy and barry. The descriptive counting of parts (always paired) in these patterns was instituted rather late, in the 1800s, as I recall.
I have proposed that heraldry is a useful investigative premise. And you have added to the evidence, which is much appreciated. I have also suggested that by this accumulation of evidence heraldry begins to function as a means of communication. After all, heraldry was intended as a means of communication and became a traditional field of medieval knowledge. Why not let it function as a means of communication without written language? What it needs is validation and that is provided by historical grounding in the VMs White Aries.
The accumulation of evidence found with the heraldic premise is far more than accidental occurrence would provide. Complexity indicates intentional construction. The author's unique use of heraldry, specifically the papelonny patterns, is an indicator of the level of that complexity. What other alternative could there be?
That's a great match. Spot on!, as they say. And to be honest, this one that you've demonstrated is all yours, The VMs pattern I'm recalling has more circles and no real outer boundary. So we can call this one Armille and still find Gurges as well - I hope.
The general pattern is often more important than the actual number of lines. The gurges pattern is not a specific number of lines. This applies even more so to the striped patterns like paly, bendy and barry. The descriptive counting of parts (always paired) in these patterns was instituted rather late, in the 1800s, as I recall.
I have proposed that heraldry is a useful investigative premise. And you have added to the evidence, which is much appreciated. I have also suggested that by this accumulation of evidence heraldry begins to function as a means of communication. After all, heraldry was intended as a means of communication and became a traditional field of medieval knowledge. Why not let it function as a means of communication without written language? What it needs is validation and that is provided by historical grounding in the VMs White Aries.
The accumulation of evidence found with the heraldic premise is far more than accidental occurrence would provide. Complexity indicates intentional construction. The author's unique use of heraldry, specifically the papelonny patterns, is an indicator of the level of that complexity. What other alternative could there be?