Plants and labels in pharma section

[Wladimir D]

Oocephalus.  I see no contradiction. Not necessarily in the herb section should be the ingredients. There must be a description of the plant, and for what purposes it is used. For ingredients have the section of recipe and section "Leaves and roots." Therefore here there are unique words. 

Many researchers suggest that the the first word in the pages of this herbal section is the name of plants. This is not true. See You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. and f55r. The first two words - also not true - You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. and f53v.

 I believe that the plants do not have names in the text. To identify the particular plant the simplified pattern. For this intended section "Leaves and roots" (not a classic, according to Diane). 

You may ask, from whence then is taken fanciful leaves and roots, which are not in herbal section?
 According to my concept of building a manuscript in the herb section are missing about 61 plants. According to the classical scheme of construction of medical manuscripts, section of recipes must be linked to grass. Anton calculations brought "groups" in the last section. Depending on the averaging method and taking into account the four missing pages, I got 190 "groups". That is, each plant to describe corresponds to one group. 190 - 129 (available). 61 = no plant.