08-02-2016, 02:35 AM
(This post was last modified: 08-02-2016, 03:13 AM by Diane.
Edit Reason: edit needed.
)
I've never been able to work up much enthusiasm for a near postscript written about a distant (supposed) memory, by a man in the last stages of senile dementia, about a single comment which - as he thinks - was made decades earlier by someone who couldn't have witnessed the supposed purchase.
However, if one accepts that as accurate then surely we're back to England and the thirteenth century again - since that information came from exactly the same source/s, is contained in the same rumour and so on.
But I admit to being fairly indifferent to theories about the manuscript's travels after 1438.
D.
However, if one accepts that as accurate then surely we're back to England and the thirteenth century again - since that information came from exactly the same source/s, is contained in the same rumour and so on.
But I admit to being fairly indifferent to theories about the manuscript's travels after 1438.
D.