[Article] Softcomputing in identification of V.M. by comparison with ancient dialects - Printable Version +- The Voynich Ninja (https://www.voynich.ninja) +-- Forum: Voynich Research (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-27.html) +--- Forum: News (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-25.html) +--- Thread: [Article] Softcomputing in identification of V.M. by comparison with ancient dialects (/thread-3972.html) Pages:
1
2
|
RE: Softcomputing in identification of V.M. by comparison with ancient dialects - DonaldFisk - 08-10-2023 (07-10-2023, 07:10 PM)bi3mw Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.That is correct. However, the authors never claimed that either. Rather, at the end of the article you can read : That's not going to work. There are plenty of closely related language pairs which have quite different scripts, e.g. Mandarin Chinese and Dungan; Hindi and Urdu; Polish and Russian; as well as plenty of completely unrelated languages which have very similar scripts, e.g. English, Hungarian, Turkish, Basque, Vietnamese, and Malay; Arabic and Urdu; Russian, Mongolian, and Dungan; Hebrew and Yiddish. Also, Khojki script is an abugida, not an alphabet. Voynichese (probably, ignoring the minor differences normally present in handwriting) doesn't have enough characters to be an abugida. To do what they are attempting to do, they should be looking at the structure and meanings of words, and the structure of sentences. RE: Softcomputing in identification of V.M. by comparison with ancient dialects - bi3mw - 09-10-2023 (08-10-2023, 11:10 PM)DonaldFisk Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Also, Khojki script is an abugida, not an alphabet. Voynichese (probably, ignoring the minor differences normally present in handwriting) doesn't have enough characters to be an abugida. I understood the difference between an abugida and a "real" alphabet as follows: Quote:From Wikipedia I would guess that within the team that wrote the article, Leah C. Windsor ( Bachelor of Science in Linguistics ) was most likely responsible for deciding whether or not an abugida was admissible for comparison. @rlozi ( René Lozi ) could forward the question to comment on this, but I think he is no longer active on the forum. |