![]() |
|
f116v is a decryption attempt? - Printable Version +- The Voynich Ninja (https://www.voynich.ninja) +-- Forum: Voynich Research (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-27.html) +--- Forum: Marginalia (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-45.html) +--- Thread: f116v is a decryption attempt? (/thread-5910.html) |
RE: f116v is a decryption attempt? - ololololo - 13-07-2026 (13-07-2026, 07:29 PM)JustAnotherTheory wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Not necessarily. Most likely the deciphering is wrong. It is possible that oladabad and miltod were an attempt to translate qokaiin qotaiin d, but the author felt that oladabad was the wrong word.(13-07-2026, 12:26 AM)Jorge_Stolfi wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.In particular, on You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. line 28 "so nim gas mich" is the only thing the author got out of this recipe. He may have just given up on deciphering it when he realized it was wrong. It would be interesting to study the principle of its decryption... RE: f116v is a decryption attempt? - ololololo - 14-07-2026 RE: f116v is a decryption attempt? - ololololo - 20-07-2026 RE: f116v is a decryption attempt? - ololololo - 21-07-2026 RE: f116v is a decryption attempt? - ololololo - 21-07-2026 RE: f116v is a decryption attempt? - ololololo - 27-07-2026 RE: f116v is a decryption attempt? - nablator - 27-07-2026 RE: f116v is a decryption attempt? - oshfdk - 27-07-2026 RE: f116v is a decryption attempt? - ololololo - 27-07-2026 RE: f116v is a decryption attempt? - nablator - 27-07-2026 |