+- The Voynich Ninja (https://www.voynich.ninja)
+-- Forum: Voynich Research (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-27.html)
+--- Forum: Theories & Solutions (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-58.html)
+---- Forum: ChatGPTrash (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-59.html)
+---- Thread: [split] Solved again... (/thread-4888.html)
Pages:
1
2
RE: Solved again... - Kendiyas - 24-08-2025
(24-08-2025, 03:44 PM)tavie Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.His folio 1r text is still made up but as imaginary Voynichese goes, it's a step up from the first effort.
Let's leave this guy be, everyone, while a decision is taken as to whether to move it to GPT Prison.
I read what he wrote 3 times still couldn’t understand to full extent maybe my english is lacking. Anyways he changed his proposed author(s) and now the proposed author was dead a century ago before the cows of the vellum were slaughtered. He is still saying that You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. is about cornflower which can simple not be true.
What really gets me is the claims of indentations for the missing pages. To make this claim; one simply must have access to the original manuscript and even probably micro CT scans of the pages. Such indentations won’t be visible in scanned manuscript nor the multispectral images. Also one has to have an idea how vellum was scribbled. This person probably thinks that the book was binded as a notebook would be and scribes wrote on the pages. This is not the case, vellum parchments were individually written before the binding of the book thus any claims of indentation can be dismissed. Also vellum is thick enough and does not act as paper does. Anyways lets leave him be as you said Tavie.
RE: Solved again... - ManaDragonLord - 24-08-2025
(24-08-2025, 05:11 PM)nablator Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.(24-08-2025, 01:48 PM)ManaDragonLord Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.The author, Arnold of Villanova, is preserving and encoding advanced botanical knowledge that combines Columella's De Re Rustica, Dioscorides' De Materia Medica, other Medieval pharmaceutical techniques, and the 9-step FHOLQAQCD system
Forgive me for the mistake of trusting AI
This time you checked everything, right?
The ma might be dead i agree after double checking the anme but his work is in the book. that means I am sorry and unsure the author of the page. the books correlate with the math and the 1.618 golder rule. the 7th line has it again the book name i provided literally has the writing in it that I expressed. What would make this more real for you is there anything I can do to help?
RE: Solved again... - ManaDragonLord - 24-08-2025
(24-08-2025, 03:44 PM)tavie Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.His folio 1r text is still made up but as imaginary Voynichese goes, it's a step up from the first effort.
Let's leave this guy be, everyone, while a decision is taken as to whether to move it to GPT Prison.
I am not GPT whatnot I am a real person. I was not using gpt or anything else to write that save my fingers. That is crazy the texts of the time period are encrypted in there and they come out after deciphering them really well. What is it that makes it so unbelievable? there are many non-encrypted texts from the era that state cornflower is the ingredient of medicine that i am stating here?
RE: Solved again... - Ruby Novacna - 24-08-2025
(24-08-2025, 06:30 PM)ManaDragonLord Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.What is it that makes it so unbelievable? there are many non-encrypted texts from the era that state cornflower is the ingredient of medicine that i am stating here?
What is inbelievable is not the cornflower, but the text that you present as coming from the f1r.
RE: Solved again... - ManaDragonLord - 24-08-2025
(24-08-2025, 03:39 PM)Ruby Novacna Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Does the text you're interpreting really exist? Or are you posting long, delusional messages just to waste people's time?
holy crap that makes sense! I was just writing down everything I did so it didn't look like a hoax looks like I have too much. you will not be able to decrypt every page.
layer 2
there are 30 letters and spaces and 26 letters alone
the mod split function gets the letters for the first line. like in the earlier post
fholqaqcd
each letter corresponds to the Columella's "De Re Rustica" 's list of 8 steps and additional quality step matching exactly the 9 character sequence.
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
you know what I think my layer 1 might be incorrect! I got caught in the same freaking trap wow! I am taking that part down.
but the math and the 9 character sequence are correct and in the text above.
RE: Solved again... - ManaDragonLord - 24-08-2025
(24-08-2025, 05:11 PM)nablator Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.(24-08-2025, 01:48 PM)ManaDragonLord Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.The author, Arnold of Villanova, is preserving and encoding advanced botanical knowledge that combines Columella's De Re Rustica, Dioscorides' De Materia Medica, other Medieval pharmaceutical techniques, and the 9-step FHOLQAQCD system
Forgive me for the mistake of trusting AI
This time you checked everything, right?
Imade myself look like a fool dang. I did find the math but think i relied too heavily on AI to help me with the language portion and it was lying to me. I asked if the information was real and it said it could not find information so it built its own information that would seem to com from the time period!! wtf. that made no sense a simple no would have been nice.
the math portion i did and the book lookup i did and it is correct. but I can't attest to the rest sorry team.
RE: Solved again... - Kendiyas - 24-08-2025
(24-08-2025, 09:27 PM)ManaDragonLord Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Imade myself look like a fool dang. I did find the math but think i relied too heavily on AI to help me with the language portion and it was lying to me. I asked if the information was real and it said it could not find information so it built its own information that would seem to com from the time period!! wtf. that made no sense a simple no would have been nice.
the math portion i did and the book lookup i did and it is correct. but I can't attest to the rest sorry team.
No problem man, we learn from our mistakes. Never trust AI on this topics they tend to “hallucinate” I am looking forward to your work I hope you can make progress and share a working theory with us. You can post it on Theories and solutions page next time. Wish you luck!
RE: [split] Solved again... - Koen G - 25-08-2025
Sorry guys, I was away for the weekend.