+- The Voynich Ninja (https://www.voynich.ninja)
+-- Forum: Voynich Research (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-27.html)
+--- Forum: Theories & Solutions (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-58.html)
+--- Thread: Voynich is encrypted ENOCH (/thread-5388.html)
Voynich is encrypted ENOCH - Radim Dobeš - 20-02-2026
Hello,
I am able to prove any part of the Voynich manuscript as a literal and accurate translation of 1 and 2 Enoch. I am attaching a sample.
RE: Voynich is encrypted ENOCH - JustAnotherTheory - 20-02-2026
Why would the angels be depicted without wings?
Why would the male angels, i.e., Gabriel, be depicted as nude dancing females with exposed breasts?
I don't think this is a very good theory.
RE: Voynich is encrypted ENOCH - Radim Dobeš - 20-02-2026
The reason is that the author probably had access to the lost texts of Enoch. (rediscovered in the 20th century). In order to preserve the text, or to be able to bring it out, he had to encrypt it. That is why angels do not have wings. The text looks like a herbarium and a recipe book, etc.
RE: Voynich is encrypted ENOCH - Ruby Novacna - 20-02-2026
Hello Radim!
It would probably be simpler (for me, at least) if you published your findings page by page.
The four figures, which you present as angels, have already been well described on this forum, for example.
RE: Voynich is encrypted ENOCH - JustAnotherTheory - 20-02-2026
(20-02-2026, 03:06 PM)Radim Dobeš Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.The reason is that the author probably had access to the lost texts of Enoch. (rediscovered in the 20th century). In order to preserve the text, or to be able to bring it out, he had to encrypt it. That is why angels do not have wings. The text looks like a herbarium and a recipe book, etc.
That sounds like a bad excuse for a huge gap in a bad theory.
RE: Voynich is encrypted ENOCH - rikforto - 20-02-2026
There is a tradeoff in this kind of theory between the idea that the text has been hidden in the pictures and the idea that it can be recognized. It is not unresolvable, but it demands a much higher bar for explanation. We need to know:
- How this imagery was recoverable for an in-group. For example, how could the artist expect people holding the Voynich to recognize the roots as scales in the first image, and link it to the Enoch text? How can *we* know they could expect that?
- Why it wasn't recoverable for the people who were not supposed to know? They were hiding it from someone, so who were they and why would this be opaque to them?
We see a lot of "looks like" assertions, and nothing here stands out as different from them. The question is, what sets yours apart and rules out the obvious objection that these drawings "looks like" a great many things?
RE: Voynich is encrypted ENOCH - Radim Dobeš - 20-02-2026
Thank you for the information on the 4 figures. So are my identifications the same? It is not a bad idea to describe page by page. I will try to patiently interpret the method of identifying individual parables here. In general, you need to pay attention to the colors (blue - divine, green - righteous, brown (leaves) - sinful, red - fire, etc.). You also need to look for distinctive words in the text, such as sword, justice, ship, book, arrows, and look for them in the shapes of plants. When you find this word in the text and in the picture, you can then read forwards or backwards and look for connections in other pictures. Be careful, the pages are shuffled somewhere and you can only be sure from the transparency or clear continuity of the paragraphs of the text. This is how the Voynich can be read as a comic based on the Book of Enoch.
RE: Voynich is encrypted ENOCH - Radim Dobeš - 20-02-2026
I am attaching one of the first pages that I deciphered thanks to the description of the words reptiles, fish, etc. You need to read Enoch. And look at the Voynich. After a while, it will start to make sense to you.
RE: Voynich is encrypted ENOCH - Radim Dobeš - 20-02-2026
Here are the key aspects of the status of this book in the 15th century:
Lost and Forgotten: While the book was known and quoted in the early church (1st-3rd centuries), it was later excluded from the biblical canon. In the West, it was lost for centuries and was not part of common medieval Bibles.
Status in the 15th century: If the text had reached them, 15th century church authorities would have considered it uninspired and dangerous because of its content (detailed descriptions of angels, demons, and apocalyptic visions).
Exception (Ethiopia): The only church to retain the Book of Enoch as canonical (sacred) was the Ethiopian Orthodox Church, which was not affected by the Western/Roman ban.
Content and "heresy": The book tells of angels (Guardians) who descended to earth, had sex with human women, and fathered giants (Nephilim), which was problematic and mystical from the point of view of the theology of the time.
Rediscovery: The entire text was rediscovered in Europe only in the 18th century (brought from Ethiopia), so in the 15th century it was a book that did not exist in Western consciousness, or was considered apocryphal (outside the canon).
In the 15th century, you would probably not have come across the 1st Book of Enoch in a regular European library or in heretical writings of the time.
RE: Voynich is encrypted ENOCH - Rafal - 20-02-2026
Quote:Content and "heresy": The book tells of angels (Guardians) who descended to earth, had sex with human women, and fathered giants (Nephilim), which was problematic and mystical from the point of view of the theology of the time.
Nephilim are not really heretical, they are in the Bible:
Genesis 6:1-4
When human beings began to increase in number on the earth and daughters were born to them, the sons of God saw that the daughters of humans were beautiful, and they married any of them they chose. Then the Lord said, “My Spirit will not contend with humans forever, for they are mortal; their days will be a hundred and twenty years.”
The Nephilim were on the earth in those days—and also afterward—when the sons of God went to the daughters of humans and had children by them. They were the heroes of old, men of renown.
It is probably some old very legend which seemed quite weird already to the author of Genesis so he just mentioned it very briefly but still mentioned it. But yes, they were generally avoided as the subject of discussion in Christianity.
But putting Nephilim aside, do you think that the textin Voynich Manuscript says something or the meaning is shown just by hidden symbols in the plants?
And why doesn't it have any order? You are basically taking and mixing random pages from different sections.