[
attachment=10792]
Thanks, Rene.
I think that in sample 20, the burnt earth (Sienna) contrasts with the red colour.
You are not allowed to view links.
Register or
Login to view.
Let's call it a hint.
(06-06-2025, 10:11 AM)Hider Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. (06-06-2025, 08:27 AM)oshfdk Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.This word that shows clear obvious retracing/correction is the first word of this block of text. And it is very obviously retraced/touched up. Nowhere else in this block I can see anything similar.
There is reason to believe that because of the large number of errors in the first sentence, the author was suspended from working on the cipher. Further writing was done by another author who had his own ink (dark).
And the reason is... ? Or is it just an ad-hoc hypothesis?
PS.: don't assume everybody can/wants to access Facebook. I don't.
(08-06-2025, 08:52 AM)Mauro Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.And the reason is... ? Or is it just an ad-hoc hypothesis?
PS.: don't assume everybody can/wants to access Facebook. I don't.
The study is not yet complete. Not all tables are filled with encryption symbols that form ligatures.
Ligatures can have different imitations. Usually these are images of EVA glyphs, but there may be other images.
For example, the inscriptions of assembly numbers in the lower right corner of the last sheet have different forms.
Apparently, these inscriptions were added by teenagers. The ligatures in uneven handwriting depict numbers (F16v, F24v, F32v, F40v, (F57v ligature is written by a professional), F66v, F84v, F86v3, F90v1, F70v, F102v), a tent with a fire (F96v), a snake (F8v, F56v, F70v, F72v), an elephant (F67r1), a bird holding something in its beak (F8v), a battle of knights (F48v), an assault on a fortress wall (F56v), etc.
The ligatures on sheet You are not allowed to view links.
Register or
Login to view. are an imitation of the Latin font.
(08-06-2025, 11:00 AM)Hider Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. (08-06-2025, 08:52 AM)Mauro Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.And the reason is... ? Or is it just an ad-hoc hypothesis?
PS.: don't assume everybody can/wants to access Facebook. I don't.
The study is not yet complete. Not all tables are filled with encryption symbols that form ligatures.
Ligatures can have different imitations. Usually these are images of EVA glyphs, but there may be other images.
For example, the inscriptions of assembly numbers in the lower right corner of the last sheet have different forms.
Apparently, these inscriptions were added by teenagers. The ligatures in uneven handwriting depict numbers (F16v, F24v, F32v, F40v, (F57v ligature is written by a professional), F66v, F84v, F86v3, F90v1, F70v, F102v), a tent with a fire (F96v), a snake (F8v, F56v, F70v, F72v), an elephant (F67r1), a bird holding something in its beak (F8v), a battle of knights (F48v), an assault on a fortress wall (F56v), etc.
The ligatures on sheet You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. are an imitation of the Latin font.
What has all this got to do with what you affirmed: "There is reason to believe that because of the large number of errors in the first sentence, the author was suspended from working on the cipher. Further writing was done by another author who had his own ink (dark)."? You gave no reasons at all. But I'll stop asking here, I don't want to drift too off-topic. Sorry.
(08-06-2025, 11:45 AM)Mauro Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.What has all this got to do with what you affirmed: "There is reason to believe that because of the large number of errors in the first sentence, the author was suspended from working on the cipher. Further writing was done by another author who had his own ink (dark)."? You gave no reasons at all. But I'll stop asking here, I don't want to drift too off-topic. Sorry.
A large group of authors took part in writing the manuscript. Some mastered the intricate code perfectly, some were students. Students always make mistakes, and their teachers correct them.
(08-06-2025, 11:58 AM)Hider Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. (08-06-2025, 11:45 AM)Mauro Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.What has all this got to do with what you affirmed: "There is reason to believe that because of the large number of errors in the first sentence, the author was suspended from working on the cipher. Further writing was done by another author who had his own ink (dark)."? You gave no reasons at all. But I'll stop asking here, I don't want to drift too off-topic. Sorry.
A large group of authors took part in writing the manuscript. Some mastered the intricate code perfectly, some were students. Students always make mistakes, and their teachers correct them.
So, without evidence, it's indeed an ad-hoc hypothesis [You are not allowed to view links.
Register or
Login to view.]. More than one, actually, considering your last post.
Let's try to keep distracting ad-hoc hypotheses out of unrelated discussions.