Cipolla marina at least nowadays is
Drimia (Urginea) maritima, a medicinal plant from mediterranean shores. In Dioscorides it is depicted as Scilla.
As such, the plant is quite recognizable, though the inflorescence is greatly simplified and stylized. Many herbals only show very rudimentary flowers. The VM with its unusually large and exotic flowers clearly is an outlier here.
In the Vienna Dioscorides and Codex Neapolitanus the plant is depicted without the flowers. It generally flowers out of the ground before leaves emerge so in nature you normally won't encounter flowers and leaves together.
![[Image: csm_06-Jahrhundert_795129a1b4.jpg]](https://www.facsimiles.com/fileadmin/_processed_/8/f/csm_06-Jahrhundert_795129a1b4.jpg)
You are not allowed to view links.
Register or
Login to view.
Looking at other herbals, it would be interesting to see how the depiction of flowers evolved.
Another possibility to consider is that the plant you showed was mixed up with other Dioscorides illustrations like
Pancratium maritimum (ERAKLION E PANKRATION) which is a very good match also flower-wise. In the Codex Neapolitanus, next to it we have a plant called EMEROKALLES. As far as I investigated, much debate has arisen over its identification even in medieval times. I strongly disagree with
Lilium martagon in plantillustrations.org. Text-wise it probably was
Hemerocallis flava which was known in Europe probably since Alexander's conquest. But the image probably also depicts
Pancratium. The dried remnants of the flowers adhering to the seedpod, in the image mis-interpreted as styles, are a perfect match, as well as the white flowers.
You are not allowed to view links.
Register or
Login to view.
[
attachment=10648]
We need to keep in mind that even in the high-end luxury herbals, illustrations were frequently switched. The text does not give much information and the authors most likely hadd never encountered these plants. They were artists, not herbalists.
Considering the VM author(s) surely had much lower quality copies, I agree that the source herbals likely contained a lot more errors and badly drawn plants.