The Voynich Ninja

[attachment=10348]
Any idea of this inscription? It seems to start with pa but the rest is quite illegible as the ink is so tiny.

(in EVA)
Glyph 1 is "s" or "r", most likely "s" in my opinion. 
Glyph 2 is "a"
Glyph 3 is "ih"

The rest is too worn without a better scan to tell. 
On the right is "saihy"

Its hard to see but I also agree with the suggested word. Is it ok to comment with my solution for translation? If you go to my thread under text analysis and my dictionary I think I remember that I wrote day temp rising on this word category.  Does this make sense for you?

FYI You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.

(17-04-2025, 02:05 PM)Bluetoes101 Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.(in EVA)
Glyph 1 is "s" or "r", most likely "s" in my opinion. 
Glyph 2 is "a"
Glyph 3 is "ih"

The rest is too worn without a better scan to tell. 
On the right is "saihy"

The truth about 102 v2 word is right on the tip of my tongue, 
but the ban hammer may silence me....
Anyway let us risk in the name of the science--> I read the word as  "Retich"- which means in German something like Radish or Turnip, translated into English... So "S" is maybe "R"?

(17-04-2025, 04:58 PM)BessAgritianin Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.[..]
The truth about 102 v2 word is right on the tip of my tongue, 
but the ban hammer may silence me....
Anyway let us risk in the name of the science--> I read the word as  "Retich"- which means in German something like Radish or Turnip, translated into English... So "S" is maybe "R"?

Well, I am German and I don't read something like this there.
You mean  sachy ?

I don't like to touch that word already, but it reads to me  таопя / taopya, which gives me nothing at this moment.
Otherwise, this is a very interesting page with nice findings.

Ist das so, dass man hier für deutsche Einwürfe gebannt wird? Wäre'n bischerl over...

The alphabet of this manuscript is very tricky. 
 
In my opinion the encryption process involves systematically obfuscation of alphabetic characters.
Why the lay observer perceives the grapheme "a" as a fixed invariant symbol, the cryptographer recognizes subtle distinctions as  o or e, or i. 
I have derived an alphabetic system through consistent translational rules. But sometimes I am being banned from using it on the basis of lack of evidence.

Back to the thread:

ROS and f102v2 - they seem to be identical, but are not.

Recognizing that my approach diverges from the conventional interpretations, according it:
the ROS word is more connected to "king", while the v102v2 word is more likely a "turnip".
I present this not as definitive, but as a hypothesis.
br: Vessy

(19-04-2025, 04:09 AM)BessAgritianin Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.The alphabet of this manuscript is very tricky. 
[..]
the ROS word is more connected to "king", while the v102v2 word is more likely a "turnip".
I present this not as definitive, but as a hypothesis.
br: Vessy

As you may have noticed, i have the completely opposite conviction of these characters not being encoded or disguised at all, just in an unusual shape.
But about v102v2 I can agree this page is about turnips, but that word does seems not to be said there. Would be on the next page, somehow.

best regards,
Stefan