The Voynich Ninja

Hmm, there are 2 issues , all percentages are different, and count for dy is different {6952} , all the other counts are the same, currently investigating { best guess atm is newlines and EVA( ' )   }

In case you can use it for comparison, here is my cleaned up file:
[attachment=9135]

Thanks for the file bi3mw, that helped find the issue.

<-> A drawing intrusion in the text.

<%>kchsy.chydaiin.ol<->o,l,tchey.char.cfhar,am    {ZL3a-n.txt} [line 71]    <f1v.1,@P0> 

kchsy chydaiin olo l tchey char cfhar am                {ZLall2.txt} [line 32]

kchsy chydaiin ol o l tchey char cfhar am               {ZL3_W.txt) [line 32]

There are 8 of these strings "d<->y" in ZL3a-n.txt and when the drawing intrusion is removed it results in a new 'dy' string.

It is possible that you may not be using the latest version of ivtt or my codeblocks ming compiler has not updated to the C17 revision .

(28-08-2024, 10:02 PM)RobGea Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.It is possible that you may not be using the latest version of ivtt ....

I use version 1.1, is that the latest ?

The latest current version is  v2.0 
Link to source code is on this page : ivtt: (Intermediate) Voynich Transliteration Tool :: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.

Updated, now dy fits

No.  Bigram Frequency (in %) Frequency
  1      CH        7.1390      11081
  2      HE        5.3267      8268
  3      DY        4.4789      6952
  4      AI        4.3745      6790
  5      OK        3.9809      6179
  6      IN        3.8939      6044
  7      OL        3.6298      5634
  8      EE        3.4204      5309
  9      QO        3.4126      5297
  10      ED        3.2960      5116
  11      II        3.0699      4765
  12      SH        2.9204      4533

edit: but now the other bigrams no longer all fit 

Nice, exact match with Cryptool.
Digram Analysis of <ZL3_W.txt>. File size 239128 bytes.
Descending sorted on frequency.

  No.   Substring Frequency (in %) Frequency
    1         ch         7.1390       11081
    2         he         5.3267       8268
    3         dy         4.4789       6952
    4         ai         4.3745       6790
    5         ok         3.9809       6179
    6         in         3.8939       6044
    7         ol         3.6298       5634
    8         ee         3.4204       5309
    9         qo         3.4126       5297
  10         ed         3.2960       5116
  11         ii         3.0699       4765
  12         sh         2.9204       4533

Very nice, "onlinetoolz" also fits. The only thing that doesn't fit anymore is the output in my text editor (rather mysterious). For example, it shows 4581 for II.

Oh yeah, same here, aha i think its the triples like 'daiiirihy'. in notepad++ it highlights them and it only only highlights 2 of the 3 i's
but ngrams would  be ['da', 'ai', 'ii', 'ii', 'ir', 'ri', 'ih', 'hy'].

EDIT:
Oh noes , i think i see another issue, grrr. i dont think EVA(-') is being processed properly, Oh well , it'll have to wait till tomorrow now.

You are right, if you subtract the 184 "iii(i)" from the 4765 "ii" then you get exactly 4581. So everything is fine ( hooray )

So we have fulfilled Rene's requirements (same results from cryptool and python script, see post #45).

No.  Bigram Frequency (in %) Frequency
  1      CH        7.1390      11081
  2      HE        5.3267      8268
  3      DY        4.4789      6952
  4      AI        4.3745      6790
  5      OK        3.9809      6179
  6      IN        3.8939      6044
  7      OL        3.6298      5634
  8      EE        3.4204      5309, 4889 + ( 413 x EEE + 7 x EEEE ) 420
  9      QO        3.4126      5297
  10      ED        3.2960      5116
  11      II        3.0699      4765, 4581 + ( 183 x III + 1 x IIII ) 184
  12      SH        2.9204      4533