As an example of how women's fashion changed much faster than that of the men, look at illustrations from the 1430's.
Here is a clear example from the You are not allowed to view links.
Register or
Login to view.. Several of the men still wear exactly the same outfit as the Gemini from the Zodiac section, but the female fashion has moved on considerably (note, for example, how they wear their hair in the "pair of temples" style common for the 1430's). The woman's fashion is much older, whereas male fashion continued over a much longer period - in the same way that men wore jeans in the 1950's and 2020 without much change, but a woman wearing 1950's style would really stand out today!
The wound turban, and the ridiculously low belt, with pleated hose and tight shoes, tight cuffs, loose elbows and distinctive neckline are all there.
![[Image: gemini.jpeg]](https://stephenbax.net/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/gemini.jpeg)
[
attachment=7013]
The problem posed by the Lauber illustration about the Trojan War is simple. Either the fashion is contemporary with the creation of illustration, which would mean that a houppelande with very dagged sleeves was still hot in Haguenau between 1445-1455, or the illustration is anachronistic, which seems more probable. And if Lauber can fake it, pretty much any other artist can as well. Which goes double for the VMs.
As usual, some things in the VMs are not easily and clearly described. Regarding the edges of the VMs sleeves, their variations are more subtle than Lauber with those big loops and sleeves to the floor. Others know more about this than I do. In the post above #91 the lady's blue garment appears to be an ermine-line 'cloak' - if that's the correct term. I don't think there is the suggestion that the VMs female is wearing and ermine-line houppelande. Maybe it's lace or artistic ambiguity.
One thing I do agree on is the need for more significant data and I will endeavour to collect more.
I believe that data is most likely to be found in the Lauber era I.e. post 1427.
For that reason I will not dwell too much on the current disagreements as it will distract from doing that.
That inspires the question of *where* the data is most likely to be found? And the clear answer from Koen's list of references is Paris. So, why Paris? Clearly this would have something to do with the scale of manuscript production, and also depend on their rate of survival.
The collection of data should continue when new information is found. For the VMs Gemini woman's sleeve, the question is how dagged is 'dagged'? And for the man, how tight is the cuff and how loose is the sleeve? Can the sleeve be too tight or too loose? Is this like the investigation of the cardinal's galero? The definition is quite specific, but the actual depictions in medieval illustrations are pretty diverse. In fact, diversity of appearance seems to be a predominant factor in medieval art, even when the scene depicted is a single, specific event. One of my favorites is Eleazar and the elephant. There is so much variation. [Tagged as 'Eleazar Avaran'.]
The M*M site already had a tag for 'sleeves'. I've added a few more.
What's the opinion on these sleeves?
You are not allowed to view links.
Register or
Login to view.
You are not allowed to view links.
Register or
Login to view.
You are not allowed to view links.
Register or
Login to view.
(29-11-2022, 07:17 PM)R. Sale Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
I don't know if that one would count, it looks plain weird.
This highlights a point though. Koen has written about other fashions that he says the absence of which in the Zodiac drawings point to a pre-1430, but from what I can tell he hasn't really specified.
He says: "The hulk-look became the norm after bag-pipes went out of style. It’s easy to recognize and was avoided for this study."
It would be interesting to see data and examples of the "hulk-look" to verify this claim. It should certainly not have been avoid as part of the study, if it really is the alternative to the baggy sleeves.
(28-11-2022, 09:19 PM)Koen G Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.My impression is that the 1400-1430 timeframe already includes a certain buffer to allow these fashions to go out of style.
It would help to have the original quotes or sources for statements like "1400-1430" or 1420s or around 1400 to around 1430, so one can know who made them and potentially find out what evidence lead them to make that statement and what precisely they are asserting.
And if there are examples from before 1400 is it wise to exclude them?
The 'Book of the Queen' illustration is from a myth about Apollo and his 'less than sunny' disposition. There are not that many examples of deeply dagged clothes for men. Lauber has some, but it's not VMs.
Provenance is what provenance is, though revision can happen. First collect the evidence; then make the exclusions.
Koen's list of manuscripts already has two pre-1400 references; both Italian. In the first decade (1400-1410) there are a variety of provenance sources. After that, however, from 1410 on, Parisian manuscripts overwhelm all other locations until it comes to those from Haguenau.
The nature of the evidence profile is going to determine the nature of the conclusion. Parisian evidence indicates an end before 1430. So, that would be valid - in Paris. Paris was occupied by the English and their Burgundian allies. Special conditions may apply. What was happening in the other locations?
One illustration provenanced to Bologna 1390-1399.
You are not allowed to view links.
Register or
Login to view.
Wide sleeves, famous book, same region.
From the year 1175. And it coincides with the fashion of the 12th century.
Some of this draughtswoman's work quickly becomes familiar.
Not necessarily in the VM, but in many other books.
You are not allowed to view links.
Register or
Login to view.