(18-05-2022, 06:24 PM)Searcher Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. my old notebook works too long with high resolution files
As far as I understand, the work is all done "in the cloud", but it takes a really long time. And sometimes it's much slower or faster, I don't really understand what controls this.
I've also noticed that the VM's outlines are often too vague for the AI to handle. I did some experiments with nymph pages but it didn't manage to preserve the facial features. It might work better if more initial steps are skipped. (The initial steps 'blur' your initial image).
I noticed that the program automatically adjusts images whose dimensions are not divisible by 64. This makes a pass take much longer than if the image format fits.
But sometimes the speed actually fluctuates for no apparent reason. Perhaps it is then due to the cloud.
(18-05-2022, 07:26 PM)Koen G Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.As far as I understand, the work is all done "in the cloud", but it takes a really long time. And sometimes it's much slower or faster, I don't really understand what controls this.
I've also noticed that the VM's outlines are often too vague for the AI to handle. I did some experiments with nymph pages but it didn't manage to preserve the facial features. It might work better if more initial steps are skipped. (The initial steps 'blur' your initial image).
At the beginning, the window with the text appears, it is written that the notepad requires much RAM. When I tried the initial size, the process was too long, so I decreased it halfway. The process became flow much quicklier.
Notably, I added to the prompt "strange women in jars", but obviously it didn't work.
My previous attempts were with 50 % skipped steps, results are little better in quality, but they hardly have resemblance with the VMs pictures. It dissatisfies, as I want to see Voynich nymphs in Serafini's style
[
attachment=6545][
attachment=6546]
I'll try to edit contrast of initial pictures in another editor to see what will happen.
(18-05-2022, 07:57 PM)Searcher Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.as I want to see Voynich nymphs in Serafini's style
Perhaps You are not allowed to view links.
Register or
Login to view. "template" by Cary Rapaport is useful. Scale the image 576 x 768.
OMG: she is
horribly beautiful. I'm still not satisfied with quality. During the process, it looks normal, but becomes pixeled in the very end. Which parameters do I need to change to get better result? Larger size is needed only or something else?
[
attachment=6548]
If there is an image you like in between during the process, you can also save this by right clicking the image. I don't know what could cause any pixelation added at the end though.
(Also: what you created is an abomination and should not exist :p)
I was trying something today but the steps are going extremely slow now, like four steps in an hour. I don't understand what causes this. Matthias suggested image dimensions before, but my input and output dimensions are the same and all multiples of the required number. My feeling is that it depends on the cloud.
Maybe you need a "clean" background. I can't test this right now because Colab is blocking me again.
[
attachment=6549]
(19-05-2022, 11:39 AM)Koen G Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.(Also: what you created is an abomination and should not exist :p)
I didn't expect exactly such a design myself.
Quote:
I was trying something today but the steps are going extremely slow now, like four steps in an hour. I don't understand what causes this. Matthias suggested image dimensions before, but my input and output dimensions are the same and all multiples of the required number. My feeling is that it depends on the cloud.
It seems it also depends on the speed of the Internet. Late at night, all goes much quicker.