11-05-2017, 06:11 AM
(10-05-2017, 08:53 PM)Koen Gh. Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.When going over "feminine" herbs, I was able to match most to a list found here:
Pseudo-Dioscorides' "Ex Herbis Femininis" and Early Medieval Medical Botany
Author(s): John M. Riddle
Source: Journal of the History of Biology, Vol. 14, No. 1 (Spring, 1981), pp. 43-81
Published by: Springer
Stable URL: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
I can recommend you to read the entire paper. It has valuable information on the problems of identifying herbs from old herbal illustrations.
I have done the same exercise, not only by looking at the names, but also by comparing with other manuscripts that include these two herbal traditions. I only briefly summarised it You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. .
Going by your two lists:
41v pontafilos, trifolia -> I could not match this to any herb (yet)
44v bouiantos -> same problem
46r inantes? -> this is nr. 26 Melena
46v text missing? -> the one at the top is out of sequence: 57 Delfion. The one at the bottom could be 69 Lachnis (*)
49r romoys -> this is 33 Aizos
50v loniasos -> this is 40 Ficios / hecios
53v papau? agste? frias? -> papaver agreste, this is 46 Moecon
61v gelocia -> was discussed elsewhere (gelosia / galesia) and is not part of "Ex Herbis".
Note (*): it looks like the illustration of Lachnis in Plut. 73.41.
Plants from Riddle's "feminine plant list" which I have not assigned are the following:
13. Sticas -> yes, missing
26. melena -> 46r bottom
33. aizos -> 49r bottom
40. ficios, hecios, alcidiabios -> 50v bottom
46. moecon -> 53v
69. Lachnis -> 46v bottom (perhaps)
70. Abrotonum -> missing
71. aparine, filantropos -> missing
I also did not find 68 Sion.
Once I figure out how to get data from my Excel files between spoiler tags, I will include both lists for Pseudo Apuleius and Ex Herbis.