![]() |
|
On the character of Wilfrid Voynich - Printable Version +- The Voynich Ninja (https://www.voynich.ninja) +-- Forum: Voynich Research (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-27.html) +--- Forum: Provenance & history (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-44.html) +--- Thread: On the character of Wilfrid Voynich (/thread-5041.html) |
On the character of Wilfrid Voynich - ReneZ - 12-11-2025 Both in the "Voynich faked it" thread and the "Voynich MS book swap" thread, statements or assumptions are made about Voynich's character - his reliability and his truthfulness. Both theories rely heavily on the assumption that Voynich should not be trusted at all, which may be a bit harsh. Now here, I don't want to go into the aspects of how his character affects these two theories. There are already threads about that, and such aspects can be continued there. If this diverges into these directions, it can be closed. What I want to do here is look both at the evidence we have for Voynich's character, and the high level of subjectivity in this entire topic. This quote is a good starting point: (11-11-2025, 06:17 PM)proto57 wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.[...] the description of Voynich, by G. Orioli, to Antonio. [...] Of course Orioli got Voynich's religion incorrect, and also, it sounds somewhat bigoted on his part... but here it is: Now there is a bit of "all booksellers are liars, said a bookseller" in this. This is not trying to be smart, but shows how easy it is, on such a subjective topic, to trust the things one wants to believe, and to distrust what one does not want to believe. This is so easy, that it may not even be done consciously. To be very specific: should we doubt that Voynich discovered a faded signature on the first folio of the MS? yet at the same time: take literally that he exchanged valuable old books for a cartload of modern trash? (Sounds like bragging to me). Should we trust Orioli? Voynich was not Jewish, not near his sixties (he was 47 in 1912) and he was described by others quite differently from a bent creature. Here is my attempt at a biography of Voynich: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. which suffers in some areas from the same unreliability of evidence. The best description of Voynich's person is the quoted chapter by E.Millicent Sowerby, which I can thoroughly recommend. It brings him to life. One has to recognise when she repeats exaggerated stories by Voynich of his earlier life though. She takes very strong issue with Orioli's description of Voynich, and quotes how Voynich's wife descibed him as having the head and shoulders of a 'Norwegian god'. I also quote a statement from one of Voynich's Polish friends, found by Rafal Prinke: "He [Wojnicz] had exuberant phantasy and took its results for reality, in which he solemnly believed. Later he became [...] a very practical antiquarian books dealer and made a considerable fortune, which he was always happy to share with anyone. And so in that man lived in agreement incredible phantasy (others call it lies), truly American pragmatism and good heart" There is also a published obituary by James Westfall Thompson, which is entirely laudatory and we should not consider useful. PS: minor details in the biography are not up to date anymore, e.g. I also have a copy of Orioli now. I would appreciate hearing about additional references if known. RE: On the character of Wilfrid Voynich - Aga Tentakulus - 12-11-2025 RE: On the character of Wilfrid Voynich - Jorge_Stolfi - 12-11-2025 RE: On the character of Wilfrid Voynich - nablator - 12-11-2025 RE: On the character of Wilfrid Voynich - Aga Tentakulus - 12-11-2025 RE: On the character of Wilfrid Voynich - Jorge_Stolfi - 12-11-2025 RE: On the character of Wilfrid Voynich - nablator - 12-11-2025 RE: On the character of Wilfrid Voynich - Jorge_Stolfi - 12-11-2025 RE: On the character of Wilfrid Voynich - nablator - 12-11-2025 RE: On the character of Wilfrid Voynich - Aga Tentakulus - 12-11-2025 |