![]() |
[Talk] Structural and Reverse-Cipher Hypothesis - Printable Version +- The Voynich Ninja (https://www.voynich.ninja) +-- Forum: Voynich Research (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-27.html) +--- Forum: News (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-25.html) +--- Thread: [Talk] Structural and Reverse-Cipher Hypothesis (/thread-4798.html) |
Structural and Reverse-Cipher Hypothesis - Capric9ne - 14-07-2025 Dear Ninja Team, My name is Hakan Adıbelli, and I’ve been conducting an independent deep-structure analysis of the Voynich Manuscript based on alchemical logic, Fibonacci sequencing, and symbolic fusion cycles across the folios. I believe I may have uncovered a key principle underlying the manuscript’s structure: namely, that each plant illustration represents not a singular species, but a fusion blueprint of multiple botanical and symbolic elements — constructed in harmonic cycles and encoded across pages via Fibonacci-derived cipher blocks. Further, I’ve come to realize that the final diagrams of the manuscript likely represent an “end state” — a symbolic interface or mechanical construct — which must be reverse-engineered to decipher earlier folios. In this view, the manuscript is not meant to be “read” linearly, but “reconstructed” structurally. The full exploration of this hypothesis is captured in my ongoing dialogue with an AI-based assistant (GPT), which has helped me formulate and refine these ideas. The original discussion is in Dutch, but I believe its insights may be of interest to your research team or broader Voynich scholars. ➤ You can access the full discussion (with live hypotheses, cipher parsing, and layered logic) here: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. I understand the document is currently in Dutch, and I am in the process of translating it into English for broader academic use. If your team would be interested in early access to this material, or would be willing to assist in its validation or dissemination, I would greatly appreciate the opportunity to collaborate or contribute to ongoing Voynich research. Thank you for preserving and opening access to this enigmatic treasure. I hope this contribution may help shed further light on its mystery. Warm regards, Hakan Adıbelli belli187@hotmail.com Venlo, The Netherlands RE: Structural and Reverse-Cipher Hypothesis - oshfdk - 14-07-2025 Hi and welcome! I'm not sure many people have time to read more ChatGPT transcripts, we've seen quite a few of them recently here. Does this hypothesis produce any specific testable predictions? RE: Structural and Reverse-Cipher Hypothesis - bi3mw - 14-07-2025 Hello, I would prefer it if you would present your theory in your own words. I'm not really into ChatGPT protocols, especially if they are not in English. RE: Structural and Reverse-Cipher Hypothesis - Capric9ne - 14-07-2025 I’d like to share a unique approach I’ve developed while analyzing the Voynich Manuscript. Unlike many past theories based on textual decryption, I approached the manuscript visually and structurally. I took time to truly study the manuscript without preconceived ideas, and what I found may offer a new path toward decoding it. The Realization At first glance, the plants seemed “alien” or fantastical. But after deeper analysis, I saw something else: many illustrations appear to be fusions of other plant forms—not standalone species, but visual combinations built from earlier illustrations. This wasn’t hearsay or echoing prior theories—this came from direct pattern recognition and comparative sketching. “Game recognize game,” as they say. The Method After testing several visual combinations (based on root, stem, leaf and geometry), a clear pattern emerged:
The Cipher On top of the visual fusion structure, I overlaid a cipher system, beginning with Hebrew character values and converting them to Latin equivalents through a custom logic layer. The result: A visually-driven cipher model, structurally based on Fibonacci dynamics and fusion theory, with a numeric-prime cipher logic connecting glyphs to meaning. What this means:
RE: Structural and Reverse-Cipher Hypothesis - Koen G - 14-07-2025 I am honored that ChatGPT speaks so highly of our forum and the researchers active here. But when it comes to Voynich solutions, it always produces untransparent non-solutions nobody knows what to do with. Do you honestly understand your own theory? Given a random page from the manuscript, could you (without ChatGPT) work on it based on your theory? RE: Structural and Reverse-Cipher Hypothesis - bi3mw - 14-07-2025 (14-07-2025, 05:11 PM)Capric9ne Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.At first glance, the plants seemed “alien” or fantastical. But after deeper analysis, I saw something else: many illustrations appear to be fusions of other plant forms—not standalone species, but visual combinations built from earlier illustrations. That the plants could be combined is actually not a new idea: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. |