![]() |
Is this good? - Printable Version +- The Voynich Ninja (https://www.voynich.ninja) +-- Forum: Voynich Research (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-27.html) +--- Forum: Analysis of the text (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-41.html) +--- Thread: Is this good? (/thread-4609.html) |
Is this good? - AxolotlDoesVoynich - 13-04-2025 Link: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. Ask me questions, or give reviews, I am open to anything. RE: Is this good? - RadioFM - 14-04-2025 How would you parse qokeedy? qok + kee + dy (woman + to be + PRESENT TENSE) qo + kee + dy (QUESTION + to be + PRESENT TENSE) What would a passage like this translate to? Quote:qokedy dy c'hety qokedy qokeedy qokeeedy lol What about some of the ar ar al reduplications? BAZATIVE 1 + BAZATIVE 1 + LIKATIVE? Or BAZATIVE 1 + BAZATIVE 1 + all? RE: Is this good? - AxolotlDoesVoynich - 14-04-2025 (14-04-2025, 12:52 PM)RadioFM Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.How would you parse qokeedy?1. (QUESTION + to be + PRESENT TENSE) is the valid one, (woman + to be + PRESENT TENSE) should be (to be + PRESENT TENSE woman): keedy qok. [font=Arial]2. I will try to solve this ASAP.[/font] 3. ar (not suffix) might be another word. 4. All is the main section, I is the actual meaning. RE: Is this good? - AxolotlDoesVoynich - 14-04-2025 (14-04-2025, 12:52 PM)RadioFM Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.How would you parse qokeedy?5. All of these words are verbs in my theory, whoops. |