![]() |
Antonio Francesco Gori - Printable Version +- The Voynich Ninja (https://www.voynich.ninja) +-- Forum: Voynich Research (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-27.html) +--- Forum: Provenance & history (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-44.html) +--- Thread: Antonio Francesco Gori (/thread-3921.html) |
Antonio Francesco Gori - davidjackson - 05-01-2023 Whilst playing about with chatGPL, it informed me that one of the owners of the Voynich manuscript was the 18th century monk, linguist, polymath and artist Antonio Francesco Gori. He's mainly known nowadays for being the bloke who stole Galilleo's finger from his casket and put it on display. Anyway, the AI claims that amongst the owners of the Voynich was: Quote:Antonio Francesco Gori: Gori was an Italian scholar who acquired the manuscript from the Jesuit College in Rome. He is known to have made some attempts to decipher it, but he was also unable to make any significant progress.I'd never heard of the bloke, so I investigated. I asked the AI: "What was the relation between Antonio Francesco Gori and the Voynich manuscript?" It said: Quote:Antonio Francesco Gori was an Italian scholar who acquired the Voynich manuscript in the late 18th century. It is not clear exactly how Gori came into possession of the manuscript, but it is believed that he acquired it from the Jesuit College in Rome, where it had been held since the early 18th century. Gori is known to have made some attempts to decipher the manuscript, but he was ultimately unable to make any significant progress. The Voynich manuscript remained in Gori's possession until his death in 1796, after which it passed to his son, who later sold it to Wilfrid M. Voynich, a Polish book dealer.[font=Söhne, ui-sans-serif, system-ui, -apple-system, 'Segoe UI', Roboto, Ubuntu, Cantarell, 'Noto Sans', sans-serif, 'Helvetica Neue', Arial, 'Apple Color Emoji', 'Segoe UI Emoji', 'Segoe UI Symbol', 'Noto Color Emoji'].[/font]Well, Gori died in 1757 (You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.), not 1796, so that's wrong. Anyway, I tried to find out more: "Did Antonio Gori sell Wilfred Voynich his famous manuscript?" Quote:No, Antonio Francesco Gori did not sell the Voynich manuscript to Wilfrid M. Voynich. Gori was an Italian scholar who acquired the Voynich manuscript in the late 18th century. It is not clear exactly how Gori came into possession of the manuscript, but it is believed that he acquired it from the Jesuit College in Rome, where it had been held since the early 18th century. Gori is known to have made some attempts to decipher the manuscript, but he was ultimately unable to make any significant progress. The Voynich manuscript remained in Gori's possession until his death in 1796, after which it passed to his son, who later sold it to Wilfrid M. Voynich, a Polish book dealer. Voynich is known to have been a collector of rare books and manuscripts, and it is believed that he acquired the Voynich manuscript in an effort to solve its mystery and add it to his collection. The Voynich manuscript remained in Voynich's possession until his death in 1930, after which it passed to his wife, who later sold it to the Beinecke Rare Book & Manuscript Library at Yale University, where it has been housed since 1969.One final attempt: "Who told you that Antonio Gori's son sold Wilfred Voynich his famous manuscript?" Quote:The information that I provided about the ownership history of the Voynich manuscript comes from a variety of sources, including historical records and academic literature about the manuscript. It is not clear exactly who sold the Voynich manuscript to Wilfrid M. Voynich, but it is known that Antonio Francesco Gori, an Italian scholar, acquired the manuscript in the late 18th century and that it remained in his possession until his death in 1796, after which it passed to his son. It is believed that the son sold the Voynich manuscript to Wilfrid M. Voynich, a Polish book dealer, at some point after that. Voynich is known to have been a collector of rare books and manuscripts, and it is believed that he acquired the Voynich manuscript in an effort to solve its mystery and add it to his collection. The Voynich manuscript remained in Voynich's possession until his death in 1930, after which it passed to his wife, who later sold it to the Beinecke Rare Book & Manuscript Library at Yale University, where it has been housed since 1969.I asked the AI a few more questions about Gori but it only referenced him in the context of the VM. QUESTION: Where is the AI getting this Gori story from? RE: Antonio Francesco Gori - Mark Knowles - 05-01-2023 That is bizarre. If the AI is right then maybe we should all pack our bags and go home and leave it all up to the AI to figure out. RE: Antonio Francesco Gori - ReneZ - 05-01-2023 Undoubtedly from someone's theory published somewhere in the depths of the internet. It reminds me of one theory by Diane O'Donovan, related to an Italian book dealer, but that was a different name, which doesn't spring to mind right now. It will probably come just after I hit 'Post Reply', in which case I will edit this post. Edit: the person's name I could not think of just before is Guglielmo Libri. RE: Antonio Francesco Gori - tavie - 05-01-2023 Even accepting the AI's error for Gori's death date, his son would have been miraculously long-lived if he sold the manuscript to Voynich in 1912! RE: Antonio Francesco Gori - ReneZ - 05-01-2023 A more far-fetched possibility is, that this is part of a 'fake news' experiment by the AI developers, to see how much of this will make it into resources like Wikipedia etc. RE: Antonio Francesco Gori - nablator - 05-01-2023 I suppose badly managed hashtable collisions in the huge dataset (or some other bug or limitation) could cause a kind of false memory. Quote:Can you list the known owners of the Voynich manuscript, with dates when they acquired it? RE: Antonio Francesco Gori - ReneZ - 05-01-2023 Well, one AI outsmarting another, and in the process getting even more things wrong ![]() RE: Antonio Francesco Gori - davidjackson - 05-01-2023 Well, I'm not surprised at Chesire's name popping up (thanks nablator!) but that wasn't the title of his paper. "The Voynich Manuscript: An Elegant Enigma" was written by Mary D'Imperio in the 70's. The only 2010 paper in Cryptologia on the Voynich that I could find was "A note on the Voynich Manuscript" by You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.. However, Gordon Rugg's "An elegant hoax? A possible solution to the VM", although originally published in a 2004 edition, is marked as published online in 2010 and this could be confusing the AI due to the similar name. AFAIK he doesn't mention Gori? RE: Antonio Francesco Gori - nablator - 05-01-2023 (05-01-2023, 03:19 AM)ReneZ Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Well, one AI outsmarting another, and in the process getting even more things wrongIt's the same AI, ChatGPT... ![]() Thinking a bit more about how it could happen, it is likely that the dataset got polluted somehow by a supposedly trustworthy source, like Wikipedia. Anyone could have posted a false story about a former owner on Wikipedia that got included into the dataset. ChatGPT works on an outdated image of the dataset, of course the false story was quickly removed from Wikipedia. Then ChatGPT is known to confabulate (it also happens when it is fed false data in a closed-ended question): this could be where the Gerald Cheshire story come from. RE: Antonio Francesco Gori - nablator - 05-01-2023 (05-01-2023, 01:15 AM)davidjackson Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.One final attempt:Well I asked about the source of the theory, not the source of the text that ChatGPT is using in its dataset. It is usually unable to answer questions about its dataset. |