+- The Voynich Ninja (https://www.voynich.ninja)
+-- Forum: Voynich Research (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-27.html)
+--- Forum: Analysis of the text (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-41.html)
+--- Thread: Different behaviours in line-final words...? (/thread-3021.html)
RE: Different behaviours in line-final words...? - nickpelling - 17-12-2019
(16-12-2019, 08:17 PM)MarcoP Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.In manuscripts that are not much abbreviated, abbreviation signs can have a preference for the end-of-line position.
An example was recently discussed You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view..
A few years ago, I posted a different example on You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. (BAV Vat Lat 410, in particular, see the 3-like 'rotated m' through the manuscript, and the rarer -9 for us). I believe that EVA:m and g could be abbreviation signs. For what is worth, m looks like an r-abbreviation and g like a d-abbreviation.
I do take your point here. What (I think) is certainly not in question is the very strong preference that EVA -m has for being both line-terminal and span-terminal. There are some interesting usage patterns to be noted if you map out am/om usage:
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
e.g. the red/green pattern on the f3-f6 bifolio is quite striking, and may well suggest a link with the f17-f24 bifolio.