![]() |
[Just for fun] State of the Voynich 2016 - Printable Version +- The Voynich Ninja (https://www.voynich.ninja) +-- Forum: Voynich Research (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-27.html) +--- Forum: Voynich Talk (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-6.html) +--- Thread: [Just for fun] State of the Voynich 2016 (/thread-1384.html) |
[Just for fun] State of the Voynich 2016 - Koen G - 01-01-2017 One of the things one learns (preferably) soon after entering the online Voynich world, is that speculation is a bad guide. We only speak confidently about those things for which we believe there is evidence, and make sure to express our uncertainty when there isn't. Speculating is fun, though, when it is clearly separated from evidence-based analyses. I thought it would be interesting to determine, by a set of questions, which beliefs are currently (i.e. at the beginning of 2017) held by the community. Then, at the end of 2017, we answer the same questions again. Like that we can see how a new year of research has influenced our personal beliefs on the one hand, and those of the community on the other. I'd find it very interesting to be able to keep a finger at the pulse of the community. Which ideas are held, and do these evolve over time? Rules
RE: [Just for fun] State of the Voynich 2016 - Koen G - 01-01-2017 My answers:
RE: [Just for fun] State of the Voynich 2016 - Anton - 01-01-2017
RE: [Just for fun] State of the Voynich 2016 - Koen G - 01-01-2017 I've already got an excel setup where I'll enter the data so we'll get some nice percentages. RE: [Just for fun] State of the Voynich 2016 - davidjackson - 01-01-2017 Oh man, I gotta do all this again? ![]()
RE: [Just for fun] State of the Voynich 2016 - Helmut Winkler - 01-01-2017 Yes/No questions::
RE: [Just for fun] State of the Voynich 2016 - Linda - 01-01-2017
RE: [Just for fun] State of the Voynich 2016 - Koen G - 01-01-2017 (01-01-2017, 06:19 PM)Helmut Winkler Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.It is a pity you did not ask „Is the script mostly based on the Latin alphabet?“ Anton recommended to drop the question since the answer would almost certainly be yes ![]() Thanks to all who responded so far! RE: [Just for fun] State of the Voynich 2016 - -JKP- - 01-01-2017 I simply can't answer these without commentary, but since I'm willing to play, I guess what I'll do is PM my answers so my ideas, right or wrong, are dated and on the record. RE: [Just for fun] State of the Voynich 2016 - Linda - 01-01-2017 (01-01-2017, 06:35 PM)-JKP- Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.I simply can't answer these without commentary, but since I'm willing to play, I guess what I'll do is PM my answers so my ideas, right or wrong, are dated and on the record. I have to admit I felt the need to add commentary and/or qualification as I was answering, but then I realized it's just a snapshot of the current state of things and doesn't lock one into anything, regardless of what anyone else might understand one's answers to indicate. Have fun ![]() |