+- The Voynich Ninja (https://www.voynich.ninja)
+-- Forum: Voynich Research (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-27.html)
+--- Forum: Analysis of the text (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-41.html)
+--- Thread: [split] Aga Tentakulus' Logical System (/thread-3168.html)
RE: [split] Aga Tentakulus' Logical System - Aga Tentakulus - 28-08-2026
Nothing has been disproved.
I’ve nothing against brute-force attacks either, but I know that they’ve achieved nothing over the last 50 years, if only because you can’t carry out a brute-force attack on a good cryptosystem. That’s precisely why it was designed that way.
Specifically regarding the Bible text. In the Bible, it’s difficult to write in the first-person plural (using the ‘we’ ending); that would imply the person was present. But I’m sure they were all already dead by the time the Bible was written, in the instances where they’re mentioned.
As you’ve seen, the distribution isn’t the same across the different sections.
However, this doesn’t apply to words such as ‘and’, ‘a’, ‘with’, ‘the’, ‘that’, etc.
Counting is fine, but it must be done correctly.
RE: [split] Aga Tentakulus' Logical System - ololololo - 28-08-2026
I think you should answer the question of why Latin is written in such an unusual way.
I'll be honest, I’m skeptical of all language theories. Even if it’s Latin. You need to explain absolutely all the features of the VMS text, and at the same time prove that such an elaborate text in the language you have presented will make at least some sense.