![]() |
|
Engineering your own voynich - Printable Version +- The Voynich Ninja (https://www.voynich.ninja) +-- Forum: Voynich Research (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-27.html) +--- Forum: Voynich Talk (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-6.html) +--- Thread: Engineering your own voynich (/thread-3592.html) |
RE: Engineering your own voynich - nablator - 03-04-2023 (02-04-2023, 04:51 PM)Searcher Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.My aim was to make a text that is similar to voynichese by statistical properties.For that, you would need to reduce the conditional entropy h2. RE: Engineering your own voynich - Mark Knowles - 03-04-2023 (03-04-2023, 07:11 AM)Searcher Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Hi David!I suspected that ChatGPT had not found the correct solution, however despite this I would not be shocked if one of its descendents decipher the Voynich manuscript in the next 10 years. RE: Engineering your own voynich - Searcher - 03-04-2023 (03-04-2023, 09:06 AM)nablator Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Hi nablator! Could I ask you to calculate that for my enciphered text?(02-04-2023, 04:51 PM)Searcher Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.My aim was to make a text that is similar to voynichese by statistical properties.For that, you would need to reduce the conditional entropy h2. I could try to calculate it myself, but I'm not sure which formula must be used. RE: Engineering your own voynich - ReneZ - 03-04-2023 (03-04-2023, 08:42 AM)nablator Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Some of them are known Latin aphorisms, others may be translated, like #5: That could be interpreted as a case of 'gnothi seauton' by ChatGPT. RE: Engineering your own voynich - nablator - 03-04-2023 (03-04-2023, 01:25 PM)Searcher Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Hi nablator! Could I ask you to calculate that for my enciphered text?Hi Searcher, h2 = 2.435 Byatan's ciphertext (in this thread) has nearly the same value of h2, not close to the anomalous values of Voynichese: I just checked two samples of lowercase EVA transliteration of the same size, got 1.3 and 1.9. RE: Engineering your own voynich - Mark Knowles - 03-04-2023 (03-04-2023, 08:42 AM)nablator Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.ChatGPT often generates bullshit when it doesn't have a clue.Despite getting the decipherment completely wrong, it appears, I am actually more impressed at ChatGPT's attempt at decipherment here than I have been at any attempt to decipher the Voynich of a human so far. In fact nobody seems to have tried to crack Voynichese as if it were a cipher. The focus seem to be on compiling statistics, which whilst certainly useful is dancing around the problem. It sometimes feels like many researchers have never tried to break a cipher and so would have no idea where to start with trying to decipher Voynichese. Sometimes one learns by trying and failing and then trying again. I think with a few more iterations of these Large Language Models we might well end up with something that could take on the Voynich and win. I hope this is not the case and it will be disappointing if the victory is stolen from humans by a machine. RE: Engineering your own voynich - Searcher - 03-04-2023 (03-04-2023, 02:16 PM)nablator Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Hi Searcher,But it is not so bad, right? It gives h3 (3.94-2.44) = 1.5. I need to think a little how to reconstruct the cipher to "voynichesly" improve it more. RE: Engineering your own voynich - Searcher - 03-04-2023 (02-04-2023, 08:10 PM)davidjackson Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view."est res iudicata saepe sequitur quod initium coeptum est."Unfortunately or not, I've find no coincidences. RE: Engineering your own voynich - Mark Knowles - 04-04-2023 (03-04-2023, 08:45 PM)Searcher Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Unfortunately or not, I've find no coincidences.What I would be interested in is whether ChatGPT's solution was logically consistent i.e. does it work? Or is it fundamentally flawed? I haven't checked this. RE: Engineering your own voynich - mja0075 - 04-04-2023 (04-04-2023, 03:31 PM)Mark Knowles Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.What I would be interested in is whether ChatGPT's solution was logically consistent i.e. does it work? Or is it fundamentally flawed? I haven't checked this. It doesn't work, the mappings it gives as examples aren't used when it's "deciphiring". If you follow up with it and ask it to give a full algorithm or key, it will apologize and say it made a mistake. |