![]() |
|
Bifolio as a functional unit? - Printable Version +- The Voynich Ninja (https://www.voynich.ninja) +-- Forum: Voynich Research (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-27.html) +--- Forum: Analysis of the text (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-41.html) +--- Thread: Bifolio as a functional unit? (/thread-5131.html) |
RE: Bifolio as a functional unit? - RadioFM - 21-09-2026 (29-12-2025, 08:44 PM)anejati wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Based on what I'm reading here, self-citation can, in theory, explain the LSA behavior, but you have to add an extra assumption: That self-citation in non-herbal sections was done Not at all. Herbal section comes first. As the scribe(s) get tired, the scriptwork is often done on a bifolia basis to speed up the process. Alternatively, drawings were made first and then scribe(s) filled in the text; in the case of drawings spanning a (yet unbound) bifolium, self-citation on a bifolium basis is quicker (no need to juggle around pages). Or perhaps each scribe simply had their own quirks when auto-copying. RE: Bifolio as a functional unit? - nablator - 11-10-2026 (14-12-2025, 07:24 PM)LisaFaginDavis wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Our article will include a link to a GitHub respository with all of the code and data. (26-09-2025, 09:59 PM)LisaFaginDavis wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Once it's published, we will also make our data and code available in a GitHub respository for all to use. Is the GitHub repository public? I could not find a link in the article: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. I tried to use an old Java LSA library but it seems full of bugs, too difficult for me to fix. I'm sure there is a perfectly fine Python implementation somewhere... RE: Bifolio as a functional unit? - LisaFaginDavis - 11-10-2026 There's still work to do to clean up the code before we can post it. |