![]() |
|
Months names are all one off? - Printable Version +- The Voynich Ninja (https://www.voynich.ninja) +-- Forum: Voynich Research (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-27.html) +--- Forum: Astrology & Astronomy (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-34.html) +--- Thread: Months names are all one off? (/thread-4731.html) |
RE: Months names are all one off? - ReneZ - 02-06-2025 That is undoubtedly correct. Unfortunately, we don't know what the title of this MS is, nor any shelfmark of any copy, and I have not been able to find anything using Google searches. The books that @nablator and I found have the same text as the Prague MS You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. "Textus astronomici (1400-1450)", but that is not the same. The claim of @BessAgritianin remains to be confirmed. RE: Months names are all one off? - R. Sale - 02-06-2025 RE: Months names are all one off? - Koen G - 02-06-2025 RE: Months names are all one off? - nablator - 02-06-2025 RE: Months names are all one off? - ReneZ - 03-06-2025 RE: Months names are all one off? - MarcoP - 03-06-2025 RE: Months names are all one off? - Koen G - 03-06-2025 RE: Months names are all one off? - Koen G - 03-06-2025 RE: Months names are all one off? - Searcher - 03-06-2025 RE: Months names are all one off? - Jorge_Stolfi - 04-06-2025 |