The Voynich Ninja
Konrad Kyeser's Bellifortis - Printable Version

+- The Voynich Ninja (https://www.voynich.ninja)
+-- Forum: Voynich Research (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-27.html)
+--- Forum: Imagery (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-43.html)
+--- Thread: Konrad Kyeser's Bellifortis (/thread-5355.html)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5


RE: Konrad Kyeser's Bellifortis - ReneZ - 14-02-2026

(13-02-2026, 07:41 PM)DG97EEB Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.So that was useful because it led me to Keyser's ciphering..So it wasn't just Fontana doing this at the time. 

These appear to be scans 333 and 335 in the provided link: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.

At first sight this reminds me of Hebrew, but I am also reminded of a cipher that was discussed by Nick Pelling (IIRC) ages ago.

In any case, the characters are very different from Fontana's and also from the contemporary cipher in Pal.Germ. 597.


RE: Konrad Kyeser's Bellifortis - DG97EEB - 14-02-2026

(14-02-2026, 11:41 AM)ReneZ Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
(13-02-2026, 07:41 PM)DG97EEB Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.So that was useful because it led me to Keyser's ciphering..So it wasn't just Fontana doing this at the time. 

These appear to be scans 333 and 335 in the provided link: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.

At first sight this reminds me of Hebrew, but I am also reminded of a cipher that was discussed by Nick Pelling (IIRC) ages ago.

In any case, the characters are very different from Fontana's and also from the contemporary cipher in Pal.Germ. 597.

YEs, it's very much like Hebrew.  There are also similar writings at the back of one of the other manuscripts from Kyser.. You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.  (5/6 and 528/529) But i don't think it is Hebrew, unless it's a form of Ashkanzai.. Funnily enough when i put it in Chatgpt to identify it told me it was Voynich, which made me laugh..


RE: Konrad Kyeser's Bellifortis - Bernd - 14-02-2026

I think it's good Kyeser gets his own thread.
Interestingly, like Johannes de Fontana, Kyeser spent time in Padua. However, since Fontana lived approx. 1395-1455 and Kyeser can only have been in Northern Italy 1389-1394 before he joined the crusade against the Turks, they can never have met. This also means that Kyeser predates Fontana. I am still looking into literature on Kyeser but I am too busy at the moment.

Regarding the stars, I agree they look similar but the method they were drawn is not. This is not surprising as nobody is proposing the illustrator of the Bellifortis is the VM artist. I agree it could have been a source.


RE: Konrad Kyeser's Bellifortis - Bernd - 14-02-2026

An interesting article exploring the conections between Fontana, Kyeser and Taccola:
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.

Pamela Long Wrote:Conrad Kyeser, the son of South German burghers, authored Bellifortis [Strong in War] between 1402 and 1405 while in exile in his home town of Eichstätt. A strikingly illustrated treatise written in Latin verse, Bellifortis is the earliest fifteenth-century technical book from the German territories. Kyeser was exiled in 1402 when Sigismund, king of Hungary and of Germany, defeated Prague, imprisoned his half-brother, the Bohemian king Wenceslas, and sent the court, presumably including Kyeser, into exile. Banished to his hometown of Eichstätt in Bavaria, Kyeser wrote his treatise in the last years of his life. The manuscript,of which there are at least fourteen exemplars, was illustrated by illuminators from the Prague scriptorium who were passing through Eichstatt after their own expulsion.
Bellifortis is the response of a bitterly angry military physician to the imperial politics of his time. Kyeser had been present at Nicopolis on that "impious day" in 1396 when the Ottoman Turks had precipitated the flight "with unheard of audacity of Prince Sigismund, hermaphroditic Hungarian king," and his imperial army. He was a victim in the struggle between Sigismund and Wenceslas, both sons of the Luxembourg emperor Charles IV.
Kyeser dedicated his treatise to the emperor Ruprecht (ruled 1400-1410) from the Palatinate (Pfalz), a weak emperor chosen by the electors after their unprecedented deposal of Wenceslas in 1400. In Bellifortis Kyeser offers technological strength to the emperor Ruprecht, advertising the efficacy of astrology, sorcery, mechanical technology, and weaponry. The lavish illustrations of the treatise depict cannon, rockets, chariots, a counterweight trebuchet, battering rams, mobile bridges, ships, mills, scaling ladders, incendiary devices, crossbows, and instruments of torture-weapons, machines, and devices both old and new. The large, expensive format,the striking illustrations, and the text in Latin verse all suggest that the emperor Ruprecht to whom the treatise was dedicated was also representative of the intended audience. Kyeser wrote a prince's book, not an engineer's.
We learn that the earliest Bellifortis copies were illustrated by artists from the court or Prague and that - like all high profile medieval manuscripts - the target audience was nobility not craftsmen. The same is true for herbals like Dioscorides.

Unfortunately, Pamela Long does not address Kyeser's codes but she writes on Fontana:
Pamela Long Wrote:The encryption of the Bellicorum instrumentorum liber can be seen as a display of writing technique involving codification rather than as a means of concealing technical information. In a cogent analysis, the editors of the facsimile edition conclude that the single existing manuscript of the work and the manuscript of Fontana's Secretum were both produced by scribes. They hypothesize that Fontana developed the code when he wrote the Secretum and that he then instructed scribes to use it to copy the earlier Bellicorum instrumentorum liber.
The secrecy embodied in the encryption is unrelated to technological detail. As the editors of the work suggest, Fontana was interested in the idea of the code itself rather than in hiding technological secrets per se.

She concludes:
Pamela Long Wrote:Although the treatises of Kyeser, Fontana, and Taccola exhibit important differences, they also share a number of characteristics. They are written in Latin, are lavishly illustrated, and display a variety of mechanical contrivances and weapons in lucid detail. They are dedicated to rulers or, in some cases, seem to have been written for rulers or military captains.They directly associate military and political power with technological power in a new way. They enhance the status of mechanical disciplines by explicating them in Latin and by associating them with antiquity and with learning.

There's a lot of other sources listed in the article but I'm out of time for now. I recommend reading it.


RE: Konrad Kyeser's Bellifortis - DG97EEB - 14-02-2026

(14-02-2026, 12:51 PM)Bernd Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.An interesting article exploring the conections between Fontana, Kyeser and Taccola:

I can't access ResearchGate unfortunately... Is there a pdf?


RE: Konrad Kyeser's Bellifortis - nablator - 14-02-2026

(14-02-2026, 11:46 AM)DG97EEB Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.There are also similar writings at the back of one of the other manuscripts from Kyser.. You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.  (5/6 and 528/529) But i don't think it is Hebrew, unless it's a form of Ashkanzai.

Not similar IMHO.

Quote:Efrayim Ben-Yiṣḥāk, Regensburg: Liturgical (Lament) Poems (Piyyutim), Fragment (kindly provided by Martha Keil and Domagoj Akrap). The poems address the Regensburg pogroms of 1137 and the Second Crusade of 1146/47.
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.


RE: Konrad Kyeser's Bellifortis - nablator - 14-02-2026

(14-02-2026, 12:57 PM)DG97EEB Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.I can't access ResearchGate unfortunately... Is there a pdf?

You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.


RE: Konrad Kyeser's Bellifortis - DG97EEB - 14-02-2026

(14-02-2026, 01:04 PM)nablator Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
(14-02-2026, 11:46 AM)DG97EEB Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.There are also similar writings at the back of one of the other manuscripts from Kyser.. You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.  (5/6 and 528/529) But i don't think it is Hebrew, unless it's a form of Ashkanzai.

Not similar IMHO.

Quote:Efrayim Ben-Yiṣḥāk, Regensburg: Liturgical (Lament) Poems (Piyyutim), Fragment (kindly provided by Martha Keil and Domagoj Akrap). The poems address the Regensburg pogroms of 1137 and the Second Crusade of 1146/47.
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.

Fair enough.. they actually are Hebrew... But the ones in the other manuscript aren't


RE: Konrad Kyeser's Bellifortis - DG97EEB - 14-02-2026

(14-02-2026, 12:51 PM)Bernd Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.An interesting article exploring the conections between Fontana, Kyeser and Taccola:
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.

[quote=Pamela Long]Conrad Kyeser, the son of South German burghers, authored Bellifortis [Strong in War] between 1402 and 1405 while in exile in his home town of Eichstätt. A strikingly illustrated treatise written in Latin verse, Bellifortis is the earliest fifteenth-century technical book from the German territories. Kyeser was exiled in 1402 when Sigismund, king of Hungary and of Germany, defeated Prague, imprisoned his half-brother, the Bohemian king Wenceslas, and sent the court, presumably including Kyeser, into exile. Banished to his hometown of Eichstätt in Bavaria, Kyeser wrote his treatise in the last years of his life. The manuscript,of which there are at least fourteen exemplars, was illustrated by illuminators from the Prague scriptorium who were passing through Eichstatt after their own expulsion.

The question then becomes, is this chain remotely plausible (or even necessary)?
Prague scriptorium (pre-1402)
    ↓ [dispersal of illuminators]
Eichstätt/Bavaria (1402-1420s) → Bellifortis tradition
    ↓ [Council of Constance 1414-1418 as mixing point?]
Werkstatt von 1418, Strasbourg/Colmar (1418-1430)
    ↓ [personnel/stock continuity] 
Lauber workshop, Hagenau (1427-1470)
    ↓ [exemplar/pattern book copied]
VMS zodiac illustrations (ineptly copied from Lauber-tradition model?)


RE: Konrad Kyeser's Bellifortis - Bernd - 14-02-2026

Not impossible.
Considering the demographics of medieval Prague, I would guess that at least some of those artists were ethnic Germans like Kyeser who spoke German rather than Czech and would have no issues finding work in other German-speaking territories. Generally we shouldn't underestimate how much and far professionals traveled for work. Whether there's a continuity from the Prague scriptorium to Lauber remains to be seen but is something we should definitely explore. However we should also keep in mind that the Prague scriptorium didn't exist in a vacuum either and the artists likely studied in Germany or Italy before receiving a position at the court in Prague, like Kyeser did. So the root of the VM imagery does not necessarily have to lie in Prague. My bet is on the city states of Northern Italy.

My personal opinion at the moment: plausible yes, necessary no. Wink