![]() |
|
Is the VM an autograph or copy? - Printable Version +- The Voynich Ninja (https://www.voynich.ninja) +-- Forum: Voynich Research (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-27.html) +--- Forum: Provenance & history (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-44.html) +--- Thread: Is the VM an autograph or copy? (/thread-3025.html) |
RE: Is the VM an autograph or copy? - ReneZ - 21-12-2019 The hole in folio 107 suggested by Aga looks perfectly like a mosquito hole, and it is not the hole that Nick was referring to. I am also extremely skeptical about the hypothesis that the hole in the lower part of folio 34 (the hole that Nick is interested in) was created deliberately by the author. It has clearly been taken into account in the design of both sides of the folio. This suggests that the hole was there from the beginning. The folios of the Voynich MS have plenty such holes. RE: Is the VM an autograph or copy? - nickpelling - 21-12-2019 RE: Is the VM an autograph or copy? - Koen G - 21-12-2019 RE: Is the VM an autograph or copy? - Aga Tentakulus - 21-12-2019 RE: Is the VM an autograph or copy? - Stephen Carlson - 22-12-2019 RE: Is the VM an autograph or copy? - nickpelling - 22-12-2019 RE: Is the VM an autograph or copy? - Stephen Carlson - 22-12-2019 RE: Is the VM an autograph or copy? - nickpelling - 23-12-2019 RE: Is the VM an autograph or copy? - Stephen Carlson - 23-12-2019 RE: Is the VM an autograph or copy? - Koen G - 23-12-2019 |