![]() |
|
A match for the famous Armadillo? - Printable Version +- The Voynich Ninja (https://www.voynich.ninja) +-- Forum: Voynich Research (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-27.html) +--- Forum: Imagery (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-43.html) +--- Thread: A match for the famous Armadillo? (/thread-5363.html) |
RE: A match for the famous Armadillo? - Bernd - 22-02-2026 (14-02-2026, 07:16 AM)JustAnotherTheory Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Barbara of Cilli is becoming a very strong candidate for having at least owned the VMS. Here are some interesting facts:Ok, I admit this is getting very interesting... It would explain how on earth the VM author got hold of Taccola's elusive De ingeneis ac edificiis, libri III-IV - the manuscript allegedly presented to emperor Sigismund in 1433. It might also explain a lot of non-standard German spellings which are lost today. Remember these people spoke and were ethnic Germans. Barbara was from Styria (present day Slovenia) which upper class and nobility were German. So were Barbara's parents. Her mother's family (Schaunberg) was from Upper Austria, her father's family (Cili) was old Styrian nobility. I'm not implying Barbara created the VM, but it's an environment that does make sense. RE: A match for the famous Armadillo? - JustAnotherTheory - 22-02-2026 Not to mention her unique crown is a match for the crown in the VMS on a woman's head. RE: A match for the famous Armadillo? - Bernd - 22-02-2026 However, this would also date back the VM quite significantly. Barbara was coronated as queen of Hungary in 1405 and empress in 1433, the same year that Taccola finished de ingeneis and (allegedly) gifted a copy to Sigismund. After her husband's death, she was in exile at the Polish royal court from 1438 to 1441. Only then she moved to Melnik until her death in 1451. Her alchemical experiments are recorded from around 1440 and she allegedly scammed merchants with fake metal transformations. Whether that was still in poland or - more probably in Melnik remains to be researched. Still it's interesting there's the story she tried to trick fellow alchemist-noble You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.. Johann is interesting because his grandmother was a Visconti and he had a copy of the You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. (see previous page) made for himself in - 1433. RE: A match for the famous Armadillo? - JustAnotherTheory - 22-02-2026 (22-02-2026, 12:55 PM)Bernd Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.However, this would also date back the VM quite significantly. Barbara was coronated as queen of Hungary in 1405 and empress in 1433, the same year that Taccola finished de ingeneis and (allegedly) gifted a copy to Sigismund. After her husband's death, she was in exile at the Polish royal court from 1438 to 1441. Only then she moved to Melnik until her death in 1451. Her alchemical experiments are recorded from around 1440 and she allegedly scammed merchants with fake metal transformations. Whether that was still in poland or - more probably in Melnik remains to be researched. Still it's interesting there's the story she tried to trick fellow alchemist-noble You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.. That's interesting indeed. I could also propose You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view., who wore the same crown as her. RE: A match for the famous Armadillo? - Bernd - 22-02-2026 Well, Barbara was known for practicing astrology and alchemy, and allegedly had orgies with naked women. So it fits her much better than her daughter. I still struggle about a context where someone had acccess to a royal library, yet wrote clumsy marginalia in provincial German, grossly misinterpreted source imagery - and depicted the (former) queen naked. If we accept the Taccola-Sigismund connection, it must have been someone from or close to the court, yet of lesser education. Probably young. RE: A match for the famous Armadillo? - DG97EEB - 22-02-2026 (22-02-2026, 06:06 PM)Bernd Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Well, Barbara was known for practicing astrology and alchemy, and allegedly had orgies with naked women. So it fits her much better than her daughter. What do they say? Believe half of what you see and none of what you hear? All the bad stuff about her was a smear campaign...The primary architect of Barbara’s reputation was a guy called Aenea Silvio Piccolomini, the man who would eventually become Pope Pius II. Piccolomini served as the chancellor to Frederick III of Habsburg, the successor and rival to the Luxembourg dynasty. The Habsburgs and the Cillis were long-standing enemies, competing for influence and territory in the southeastern reaches of the Empire. Piccolomini’s writings, particularly his descriptions of Barbara as the "German Messalina," were designed to delegitimize her and, by extension, the Luxembourg claim to the various crowns she held. RE: A match for the famous Armadillo? - JustAnotherTheory - 22-02-2026 (22-02-2026, 06:06 PM)Bernd Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Well, Barbara was known for practicing astrology and alchemy, and allegedly had orgies with naked women. So it fits her much better than her daughter. Fully agreed. But in that case, we have to answer the following questions:
RE: A match for the famous Armadillo? - Bernd - 22-02-2026 1) The marginalia are associated with imagery that is identical to the rest of the VM and closely matches imagery on the same bifolio. The flower on You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. the person on You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. the nymph and goat on You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. . It is thus highly probably that the author of the marginalia is also the VM artist. 2) Whether the text was written by the same person who drew the images is less clear, let alone if Voynichese is a 'complex cypher script'. I personally doubt that Voynichese is the work of a genius but the discrepancy to the marginalia and imagery bothers me too. So far, I have no answers for that. I am currently reading the biography of Barbara of Cilli by Daniela Dvořáková. Quite an interesting life. RE: A match for the famous Armadillo? - Bernd - 23-02-2026 That was quite a sobering read. DG97EEB is of course absolutely right, the whole Barbara von Cilli image of orgies and secret alchemy is nothing more than a sensationalist fairytale. Would be a great story for a VM movie - but has nothing to do with reality. Quote:The account of the relations between Ulrich of Cilli and Frederick III Habsburg is associated with Queen Barbara; it is, in fact, the key to clarifying the origin of the negative historical legend of Barbara. It was there, at the court of Frederick III, that this legend was born. The foundation stone on which it later grew was Emperor Frederick’s hatred toward the Cilli family. In 1443, the famous humanist Aeneas Silvius Piccolomini, a close friend of chancellor Kaspar Schlick, began working as a royal secretary at Frederick’s court. Piccolomini thus could not have had any information about the Cillis other than negative information, because he got it from Frederick III and from Schlick. He spent more than ten years at the Habsburg court, providing it with valuable services not only as a secretary, but also as a diplomat and writer. He mostly served the king in the field of ruling propaganda, and through his literary works he created the image of persons and events as his patron so desired. The king eventually awarded him the title of “poeta laureatus.” In the services of the Roman-German king, Aeneas Silvius later became the bishop of Trieste, and the bishop in Siena in 1449. His career reached its peak in 1457 when a three-day conclave in Rome elected him as pope (he took the name Pius II). The sources for her alleged practice of alchemy are also wonky at best. As she was extremely busy and troubled with various problems while Sigismund was alive, we can rule out she practiced alchemy during that time (before 1438 and her exile to Poland). Quote:Aside from several small mentions of Barbara’s letters and tiny references in the Old Czech Annals, we know nothing more about Barbara from this time. She lived like a queen in Mélnik, but how she spent her days and who made up her court all remain shrouded in mystery. The invented fantasy of Aeneas Silvio, who in his later literary works created the reputation of Barbara as a licentious woman, indulging herself at Mélnik in a tumultuous life with her young lovers, we can flatly condemn as a politically motivated figure of the writer’s imagination. Perhaps the only information worth considering is that Barbara devoted herself to alchemy at Mélnik, and had relatively good knowledge in this field. So what to make of this? Barbara certainly was a bold and educated woman who did the things she felt were necessary in the way she deemed right. She was the de-facto ruler of Hungary in Sigismund's absence and due to her personal possessions probably the wealthiest and most powerful woman of her time which brought her many enemies. Anything else however is greatly exaggerated. There are several issues with the idea that her immediate surroundings were involved in the creation of the VM.: First of all, when Sigismund returned from Rome and stayed in Mantua in Sept. 1433 where he allegedly received Taccola's manuscript copy, he was in an extreme hurry to get to the council of Basel. He certainly had other worries than dealing with some obscure sketchbook. If it existed, it probably ended up somewhere with his entourage never to be seen again. Or was left in Basel. Sigismund only returned to Hungary in October 1434 and the reunion with Barbara was not a happy one. Sigismund again had her stripped of all possessions and de-facto removed from power, presumably because of the way she governed the country while he had been gone for 4 years. Barbara's character showed traces of her father’s hardness and ruthlessness, especially if money was involved. She mainly governed her personal possessions (which included a substantial part of Hungary) and made sure all taxes were duly paid to her, no matter what. She also struggled against Hussite incursions, with varying success. A large part of the Hungarian Kingdom was devastated by attacks. By mid 1436, Sigismund had reconciled with his wife, restored her possessions and took Barbara to Bohemia to have her crowned Queen of Bohemia. She only briefly ever returned to Hungary - as prisoner after Sigismund's death. It's important to understand why her stepson Albert, husband of her daughter Elizabeth, felt the need to get rid of Barbara, accusing her of treason and pretending the dying emperor had issued an arrest warrant for his wife. She rightfully owned lage parts of the Hungarian kingdom as private property, including strategically important castles, had enormous wealth and still was the wife of the late emperor. Ruling against her will as new king would not have been feasible. In theory she could even have prevented Albert's succession by remarrying, though this was certainly not in her interest as she would have lost all her possessions in this case. She later was set free but permanently lost all her possessions in Hungary. When Albert was crowned King of Hungary and Bohemia in 1438, tensions flared up as many Hussites rejected him. Barbara decided to escape beyond Albert's reach. Quote:She sought protection at the Polish court; long years of good relations with the Polish royal court now helped her find refuge. The flight of the queen from Hungary, where she had spent her entire life and where several months before she had been one of the wealthiest and most influential persons in the country, was not easy. Barbara left the Hungarian Kingdom in an entourage of 500 riders laden with all the wealth she was able to place on wagons. Her escort on the road to Poland was attacked by Albert's supporters, who killed 150 people in the resulting battle and captured another 200. The queen herself barely escaped with her life, but she lost all of her treasures in the fight.This means even in the highly unlikely event that a Taccola copy remained in Barbara's possession, it would have been lost during her flight to Poland and never made it to Melnik. Barbara basically from scratch there, living wealthy from the taxes of Bohemian possessions granted to her, but by no means luxurious. TL;DR The chain of events that would wash a Taccola copy to Melnik castle to an Alchemy-practicing Barbara are - extremely speculative. If the crowned nymph in the VM really depicts Barbara, it was probably rather created by her enemies than her supporters. The question however remains how and where the VM artist got hold of a copy of Taccola's book then? RE: A match for the famous Armadillo? - Koen G - 23-02-2026 Thank you, Bernd, that's a great write-up. Well, for starters, I don't think a hypothetical copy of book 3+4 for the emperor would have necessarily gone to Barbara. But since we don't even know whether such a copy existed, musing about its destination is compounding speculations. What I find more likely is that someone else got the chance to browse Taccola's autograph, or even the sketches he made in preparation. We know that he was concerned about copyright, but it's not like he was writing in some dungeon, hissing at anyone who came too close. He worked as the secretary of the "Sapientia", a charitable organization for poor scholars, which also housed the court in 1432. It was also connected to a hospital. I mean, this guy was "out there", meeting students, international visitors, renaissance figures... If only one of those had been allowed at any point to copy part of Taccola's work, that's enough to create a possible point of contact. We also don't know what happened to books 3+4 when they were finished. Unlike books 1+2, they were not added to by Taccola, so perhaps they were kept elsewhere. |