![]() |
|
Was Hartmann Schedel in possession of the VMS? I think so. - Printable Version +- The Voynich Ninja (https://www.voynich.ninja) +-- Forum: Voynich Research (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-27.html) +--- Forum: Theories & Solutions (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-58.html) +--- Thread: Was Hartmann Schedel in possession of the VMS? I think so. (/thread-5307.html) Pages:
1
2
|
RE: Was Hartmann Schedel in possession of the VMS? I think so. - ReneZ - 28-01-2026 In some of these guesses/claims, it is not clear if it concerns the marginalia or the main text. Right now there is no way of telling what is the language of the plain text (if there is one). The Voynich MS text is equally far away from all of them. RE: Was Hartmann Schedel in possession of the VMS? I think so. - JoJo_Jost - 28-01-2026 (28-01-2026, 07:07 AM)Jorge_Stolfi Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.(28-01-2026, 06:54 AM)JoJo_Jost Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.The problem is the regional differences in spelling, which leads directly to a deep exegesis in every attempt at deciphering if you apply Voynich as a simple cipher in Bavarian. No, not because of the images or the marginalia. Because of the structure of the Voynich text, these statistical anomalies, low entropy, frequent repetitions with only slight changes, the small alphabet (in Bavarian, you basically only need about 20 letters, if that) and a rather monosyllabic orientation – all of this fits perfectly with Bavarian (or a similar dialect that was pronounced correspondingly short and probably also written that way at the time). I have examined texts and found that, if written in a slightly less standard form of High German, they show great similarities. And I'm afraid that's a damning verdict on the possibility of deciphering it. Because there are so many possible interpretations of a cipher that has encrypted the language phonetically, if you don't know the dialect exactly. It's like a jigsaw puzzle with about 12,000 pieces, many of which are just blank.... RE: Was Hartmann Schedel in possession of the VMS? I think so. - JoJo_Jost - 28-01-2026 deleted - reason: off topic RE: Was Hartmann Schedel in possession of the VMS? I think so. - Jorge_Stolfi - 28-01-2026 (28-01-2026, 10:40 AM)JoJo_Jost Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.And I'm afraid that's a damning verdict on the possibility of deciphering it. Because there are so many possible interpretations of a cipher that has encrypted the language phonetically, if you don't know the dialect exactly. It's like a jigsaw puzzle with about 12,000 pieces, many of which are just blank.... If it were indeed some Bavarian dialect, it would be easy to crack. No matter how divergent and obscure, it would have the same basic Germanic structure, and many words would be very similar to any reference dialect. See "des", "dass", "so", "wo", "wenns", "is" in the examples you gave. Even if it was encrypted, as long as the encryption was one-to-one on words (as the statistics indicate), it would be possible to identify function words like those, and some common nouns like "herb"... All the best, --stolfi RE: Was Hartmann Schedel in possession of the VMS? I think so. - tavie - 28-01-2026 This is getting off topic. JoJo, do you want me to move to your Bavarian monosyllabic thread or create a new "Bavarian theory" thread? RE: Was Hartmann Schedel in possession of the VMS? I think so. - JoJo_Jost - 28-01-2026 Sorry, Tavie u re right. RE: Was Hartmann Schedel in possession of the VMS? I think so. - Yavernoxia - 28-01-2026 (27-01-2026, 09:15 PM)JustAnotherTheory Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.I have a theory that the VMS was once in the possession of Hartmann Schedel, a 15th century humanist (and avid book collector), who is famous today because he wrote the Nuremberg Chronicle.In my opinion, the illustration style does not resemble that of the Voynich Manuscript at all; in fact, the two styles appear to be completely different. Red lips and cheeks are not particularly unusual, and the animals are fairly generic. RE: Was Hartmann Schedel in possession of the VMS? I think so. - Rafal - 28-01-2026 I don't feel competent talking about Bavarian dialects but lets go back to the original topic...This Pauper Bible and Voynich Manuscript are a bit similar but they are similar in a a generic and not specific way. Let me explain: - they are both on the "cheap" side, without golden ornaments and illustrated by not so good artists - they both have "German style" (my subjective impression) But they are not drawn by the same man. Details are different and the Pauper Bible artist is not good but still a bit better than Voynich artist. And there is no "wow factor". No any single pair of pictures that would have some striking similarity. But lets say they are somehow similar. So what? Claiming that some Hartmann Schedel owned Voynich Manuscript because he owned a similar manuscript is a very long shot. And long shots are usually missed. |