![]() |
|
Marginal 16r? - Printable Version +- The Voynich Ninja (https://www.voynich.ninja) +-- Forum: Voynich Research (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-27.html) +--- Forum: Marginalia (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-45.html) +--- Thread: Marginal 16r? (/thread-2414.html) Pages:
1
2
|
RE: Marginal 16r? - -JKP- - 21-10-2018 If it's 15 (which seems every bit as possible as "h"), then there is some unaccounted-for dark blob above where the stem of the "1" would end. Now, if it is 15, then there might be an explanation for the blob... Scribes quite frequently put a dot above the number 1, but I can't tell from the scan... the "dot" might be a wormhole or other parchment anomaly. . If it is 15, it's an atypical style, a little too long (I'm not saying it can't be 15, it's possible, even "5" is possible, but the stem is longer and straighter than the more common styles and doesn't have as long of a top-bar as the other VMS foliation numbers). It's pretty messy. I really can't tell, but if it is "h", then it's a calligraphic "h" and if it is "5" then it is likely added in the 15th to 17th centuries (it's the later form, not the earlier form). My numerals database isn't as extensive as my letters database, but the closest one I could that was similar to the shape (if it is "5") is from c. 1470, with the foliation probably added in the 16th or maybe the early 17th century. Origin unknown. If I find any better examples, I'll post. RE: Marginal 16r? - -JKP- - 21-10-2018 RE: Marginal 16r? - Anton - 21-10-2018 RE: Marginal 16r? - Anton - 21-10-2018 Strange things with pagination in folios 15 and 16 - Anton - 25-01-2020 RE: Strange things with pagination in folios 15 and 16 - ReneZ - 26-01-2020 RE: Strange things with pagination in folios 15 and 16 - Anton - 26-01-2020 RE: Marginal 16r? - Wladimir D - 26-01-2020 RE: Marginal 16r? - Anton - 26-01-2020 |