![]() |
|
Is the VM an autograph or copy? - Printable Version +- The Voynich Ninja (https://www.voynich.ninja) +-- Forum: Voynich Research (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-27.html) +--- Forum: Provenance & history (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-44.html) +--- Thread: Is the VM an autograph or copy? (/thread-3025.html) |
Is the VM an autograph or copy? - Stephen Carlson - 20-12-2019 I can't seem to find a thread devoted to this topic, though it has been briefly broached recently, but here it is: Is the VM an autograph or a copy? By "autograph" I mean that the VM embodied the first, finished instantiation of a literary work (or whatever it is). (It is of course possible that it was composed on some scratch medium and transferred to the codex.) By "copy" I mean that some earlier MS instantiates the work and what we have is a scribal copy of it. I'm curious what evidence exists for determining whether it's an autograph or a copy? Brainstorming, I would suggest that possible evidence for it being a autograph / against it being a copy are:
Possible evidence against autograph / for copy:
Am I missing anything, beside an ability to play devil's advocate? RE: Is the VM an autograph or copy? - -JKP- - 20-12-2019 RE: Is the VM an autograph or copy? - Wladimir D - 20-12-2019 RE: Is the VM an autograph or copy? - Stephen Carlson - 20-12-2019 RE: Is the VM an autograph or copy? - Stephen Carlson - 20-12-2019 RE: Is the VM an autograph or copy? - Koen G - 20-12-2019 RE: Is the VM an autograph or copy? - ReneZ - 20-12-2019 RE: Is the VM an autograph or copy? - MarcoP - 20-12-2019 RE: Is the VM an autograph or copy? - -JKP- - 20-12-2019 RE: Is the VM an autograph or copy? - -JKP- - 20-12-2019 |