19-03-2018, 08:05 PM
19-03-2018, 09:05 PM
Ant's and Ninja and scientists.
I have been writing to you for years. The manuscript is written in Czech language !
It is written by the author on evey side of it.
I'll show you how to look at the pictures. :-)
For example image f2r.
The plant has its root. Without root, the plant not exist. Root is made from letters. This is what the author tells us the important thing. ! The basis of each word is the letter !! ( The basis is the letter ). The letters = C.G.S.L have a value of 3 in the Jewish substitution. Therefore, in figure 3 there are flowers.
Instruction and key is written in multiple side manuscript.
The whole manuscript is written in Czech. The author is Eliška z Rožmberka .( Elizabeth of Rosenberg)-
All letters are numbers !!! :-)
I have been writing to you for years. The manuscript is written in Czech language !
It is written by the author on evey side of it.
I'll show you how to look at the pictures. :-)
For example image f2r.
The plant has its root. Without root, the plant not exist. Root is made from letters. This is what the author tells us the important thing. ! The basis of each word is the letter !! ( The basis is the letter ). The letters = C.G.S.L have a value of 3 in the Jewish substitution. Therefore, in figure 3 there are flowers.
Instruction and key is written in multiple side manuscript.
The whole manuscript is written in Czech. The author is Eliška z Rožmberka .( Elizabeth of Rosenberg)-
All letters are numbers !!! :-)
19-03-2018, 09:17 PM
Welcome to the forum Josef.
Please open a new thread to discuss your theory, and do not hijack other threads. Thank you.
You may want to post an introduction to yourself and your theory in the "introducing researchers" forum.
Please open a new thread to discuss your theory, and do not hijack other threads. Thank you.
You may want to post an introduction to yourself and your theory in the "introducing researchers" forum.
19-03-2018, 10:21 PM
Hello David. There is no theory. This is the ultimate solution.
I've translated the whole manuscript 408. And so I know. :-)
I've translated the whole manuscript 408. And so I know. :-)
19-03-2018, 10:36 PM
Josef, forum policy is that specific personal theories as well as Ultimate Solutions should be contained within a single thread. If you keep introducing it in other threads, this is unpleasant for other users. Feel free to make a separate thread where your Ultimate Solution can be discussed.
20-03-2018, 05:48 PM
(18-03-2018, 08:13 PM)Koen Gh. Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.The roots of teasel in You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. (15thC Constantinople) reminded me of the roots of this plant:
I have checked Collins and (quoting Touwaide) she dates the ms to the XIV Century.
In You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. (p.49) Touwaide dates the ms to the 1360s (on the basis of the paper watermarks).
20-03-2018, 08:18 PM
Apropos of nothing, teasels were so important to the English economy (wool making) that Edward II banned all export of them in 1326 (You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.). It seems Dutch fabric makers were buying them all up and shipping them abroad, causing a scarcity across England, in an early example of economic warfare.
Quote: and we do therefore desire that none of the thistles that in English are called 'taseles, You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. ' and no fullers' earth, shall be carried out of the same kingdom and lands;
20-03-2018, 08:47 PM
I remember that some time ago we were discussing the possibility that the rightmost plant on You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. depicts teasel. The plant next to it has similar leaves to the You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. plant. I can only remark this and find myself unable to come up with even a hypothetical explanation, apart from "pure coincidence". Still, here they are:
[attachment=2028]
[attachment=2028]
20-03-2018, 09:06 PM
If you look at the snaky root, you will see it has eyes. I think it probably does represent a snake and is probably one of the plants with viperina or serpentina in the name (bistort is one of the possibilities).
The similarity in the leaves to the knapweed (I think it's probably brown knapweed based on the shape) might be coincidental. There are many plants with leaves like this, especially if the plant has been dried (which pushes the leaves together in a clump), so it's hard to know if there's any connection between the knapweed plant and the one with the snake root.
I don't know if others have suggested teasel for the plant on the right, but it has always looked like teasel to me (as we discussed on the earlier thread), and I still think the thick messy root is a representation of raw, uncarded wool. I honestly believe that's why it was drawn that way.
The similarity in the leaves to the knapweed (I think it's probably brown knapweed based on the shape) might be coincidental. There are many plants with leaves like this, especially if the plant has been dried (which pushes the leaves together in a clump), so it's hard to know if there's any connection between the knapweed plant and the one with the snake root.
I don't know if others have suggested teasel for the plant on the right, but it has always looked like teasel to me (as we discussed on the earlier thread), and I still think the thick messy root is a representation of raw, uncarded wool. I honestly believe that's why it was drawn that way.