2 hours ago
I think it’s better to post this in the Imagery section rather than in my thread about the cipher, since it doesn’t relate to the cipher.
Studying the symbols of the 4x17 sequence on the f57v, I noticed one feature: all the symbols going from l to the second r (with the exception of x, v, which I consider to be a, and an incomprehensible symbol) can form bigrams with o: ol, od, or, ok, om? (maybe m = iin), of, ot.
If you number the first five characters from 1 to 5, you get a generally logical picture.
[attachment=18940]
Then these same bigrams can be conventionally denoted as numbers:
ol = 12
od = 13
or = 14
oa = 15?
However, numbering the symbols in order doesn’t make sense — there will be 17 of them, and this number doesn’t give us any meaning.
After trying to find an alternative sequence that fits the number 17, I came up with the following:
1 2 3 4 5 10 11 12 13 14 15 20 21 22 23 24 25
[attachment=18942]
If you number the symbols in this way, you can notice that the most common bigrams appear at positions up to x = 20. You can check for oy and oc — they occur much less frequently compared to the same or, ol, or ot.
This all seems like numerical logic, but it’s not that straightforward…
What do you think?
Studying the symbols of the 4x17 sequence on the f57v, I noticed one feature: all the symbols going from l to the second r (with the exception of x, v, which I consider to be a, and an incomprehensible symbol) can form bigrams with o: ol, od, or, ok, om? (maybe m = iin), of, ot.
If you number the first five characters from 1 to 5, you get a generally logical picture.
[attachment=18940]
Then these same bigrams can be conventionally denoted as numbers:
ol = 12
od = 13
or = 14
oa = 15?
However, numbering the symbols in order doesn’t make sense — there will be 17 of them, and this number doesn’t give us any meaning.
After trying to find an alternative sequence that fits the number 17, I came up with the following:
1 2 3 4 5 10 11 12 13 14 15 20 21 22 23 24 25
[attachment=18942]
If you number the symbols in this way, you can notice that the most common bigrams appear at positions up to x = 20. You can check for oy and oc — they occur much less frequently compared to the same or, ol, or ot.
This all seems like numerical logic, but it’s not that straightforward…
What do you think?