24-08-2026, 09:17 PM
That, too, would in a sense – at least if it were a simple substitution – require a kind of natural language that would be relatively easy to crack and would not fit the statistical anomalies of the VMS.
In fact, this cipher, if indeed it is one, is based on a highly organised structure. Look at the families (the ‘E’ family, ‘aiin’, ‘air’, ‘Familien’, ‘ol’ / ‘or’, bigrams ‘ar’, ‘al’); this means that the VMS is either a more complex cipher that wouldn’t need such an abbreviation, or it is a hoax – though statistically, there is much to suggest it is not a hoax.
So the conclusion remains: it is a simple yet more complex cipher, or – though I can now more or less rule this out, though not entirely – Chinese...
In fact, this cipher, if indeed it is one, is based on a highly organised structure. Look at the families (the ‘E’ family, ‘aiin’, ‘air’, ‘Familien’, ‘ol’ / ‘or’, bigrams ‘ar’, ‘al’); this means that the VMS is either a more complex cipher that wouldn’t need such an abbreviation, or it is a hoax – though statistically, there is much to suggest it is not a hoax.
So the conclusion remains: it is a simple yet more complex cipher, or – though I can now more or less rule this out, though not entirely – Chinese...