21-07-2026, 02:19 AM
I believe the general consensus that the masses are stumped by MS-408, not only by the originality of it's script, but by what the actual glyph's could represent. The possibility of a decryption is out there, yet knowing the behavior of the MS-408, I doubt it would relate to any known language with fluent grammar. Well behaved sentences from a language with a decryption, I guarantee will not happen with MS-408. Even a straight across substitution using "Eva" would still show irregular behavior of its said language. Serious cryptologists like Turing, Friedman, Tilman and Currier all gave it a shot to try and give meaning to MS-408 without success. Does this imply the MS-408 design was meant to thwart decryption, especially with the world throwing into the ring with no complete translated message that's coherent? I say yes, sorry! Let's face it Yale covets' an obscure duck that has no quacking language, maybe it does have some meaning, but nothing fluent.When I say meaning it maybe be enough to show the world what is in MS-408, however it will not be like reading Edgar Allen Poe!
Here is the other side of the coin, if it is a conlang solely constructed to have meaning for an in group of ?????? when decoded than the language maybe alien. However what decryption option is the one to show the alien text? Are they people like I just said or are they the fallen? Now I know I just left some readers behind. The whole document seems like a cover up and I'm digging deep because, MS-408 has been around for an enough time to already be translated.
People go off on a tangent about gobeliegook, hoax and so many ai translations then we are always stuck at staring at MS-408 dead ends. Or is there a group referencing MS-408 as there lost language from a previous decryption? If it is an alien language does it have a cross reference to a known language and here is where I have too let go or I will get in trouble. You have enough, farewell.
[attachment=16685]