And if you keep exploring this further, a pattern emerges.
Now you can swap lots of things around; the result is constantly changing.
I’ve already written about this. For those who aren’t familiar with it.
You are not allowed to view links.
Register or
Login to view.
Now that a pattern is becoming apparent, I can get to grips with the system.
(03-07-2026, 10:16 PM)Aga Tentakulus Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. (03-07-2026, 09:51 PM)ololololo Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Pairs of letters - ch/sh and k/t, not bigrams.
I don’t understand your point of view.
The way I see it, there are two combinations and two individual characters.
But they aren’t the same as, for example, ‘9’ being written as ‘us’. Here, it’s an abbreviation and not a ‘g’.
You need to understand everything, because nothing is really the same.
So ‘4’ and ‘q’ aren’t the same.
I can already hear you saying, ‘It’s the same thing.’
But it isn’t, because the truth is, it’s already been done that way.
That is cryptology.
I didn't understand what these examples were for. Apparently, we need to think more simply
The only thing I wanted to say is that there are many words in the manuscript that differ only in one letter,
ch/
sh and
k/
t, respectively. If you still don't understand, then I meant that if there is
okedy, then there is
otedy; if there is
cheody, then there is
sheody.
I wrote here, that I could maybe explain the “shedy” phenomenon, so I hope it's okay if I post the link here. If not, just delete the post.
You are not allowed to view links.
Register or
Login to view.