I will break out and say that I liked that post of Thomas. Maybe there are inaccuracies but there are many interesting comparisons as well.
Inspiration for benched gallows:
"Dann" (so, then in German) as inspiration for "daiin"
I hope that Thomas will write more on his new blog. He talks about "Voynich forgery" but doesn't explain it much yet. I would like to learn his argumentation.
Was Thomas Ernst aware of the multispectral scans? I guess not. I wonder how this additional knowledge would have influenced his view of the marginalia.
(08-03-2026, 09:31 PM)Bernd Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Was Thomas Ernst aware of the multispectral scans? I guess not. I wonder how this additional knowledge would have influenced his view of the marginalia.
Thomas Ernst will present his speech 'The Alphabet of the Voynich Manuscript Explained' at the You are not allowed to view links.
Register or
Login to view. next Wednesday.
The Analysis of the Voynich Manuscript Alphabet would benefit from a more thorough engagement with existing literature and Voynich ninja forum discussions.
Example: Marginalia interpretations of the presentation are not only inaccurate but represent incredibilty.
Previously published explanations are overlooked. For example 17r- the finding that this is the scientifical name of the herb - written in Latin as "malher alber"- mallow is interpreted as "mallier aller". Not speaking about the last sentence of 116v: "So nim jasmich"- interpreted as "gas mich".
Here is my recommendation- for the presentation to be more meaningful contribution to the field, must address the existing state.