13-04-2016, 07:49 PM
I am currently convinced that the Voynich Zodiac isn't a zodiac at all.
Instead, it's a late medieval Spanish-based myrogenesis - the attributing of specific characteristic to each degree of the zodiac.
The zodiac signs simply illustrate the month, the nymphs around the zodiac are paranatellonta, the aspects that astrology granted each degree around zodiacal sign.
In fact, I suspect the zodiac is actually a lapidary.
A year ago I put up a long blog post explaining this and examining historical precedent You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view..
I'm currently revisiting this topic with new information, and I'd love to hear your opinions on this before I finish off my article.
Instead, it's a late medieval Spanish-based myrogenesis - the attributing of specific characteristic to each degree of the zodiac.
The zodiac signs simply illustrate the month, the nymphs around the zodiac are paranatellonta, the aspects that astrology granted each degree around zodiacal sign.
In fact, I suspect the zodiac is actually a lapidary.
A year ago I put up a long blog post explaining this and examining historical precedent You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view..
I'm currently revisiting this topic with new information, and I'd love to hear your opinions on this before I finish off my article.