19-03-2025, 09:02 PM
Both historical representations of a solar head with a headband are from copies of texts in the Aratea tradition [Leiden and St. Omer, above], which was an astronomical / astrological text from classical sources. However, there are several problems. Both are dated c. 1000 CE, making them four hundred years old during the VMs C-14 dates.
Other copies of the Aratea are even older. They may cover the same topics, but there are variations. Not every representation of the sun shows Apollo with a headband, but not all the evidence is available so far, especially for anything closer to the VMs dates.
Wikipedia articles on Apollo and Helios have a lot of interesting images - but there is a shortage of headbands there as well.
Another image in the Aratea is a diagram of the cosmos, a geocentric version showing the planets and their orbits, within a circle of the Zodiac. Not all versions have exactly the same structure, but the Leiden and St. Omer versions (with the headbands) have the same cosmic structure, one which shows Mercury and Venus as satellites in orbit around the sun, rather than the "standard" medieval model where all planetary spheres were concentric around the Earth.
Apparently, putting Mercury and Venus in orbit around the sun made the geocentric cosmic model more accurate. Now look at the VMs cosmos, in comparison with BNF Fr. 565 and Harley 334 illustrations. All the planets and their orbits are missing from this extremely simplified type of cosmic structure. Not only is there a loss of all planetary information in the VMs cosmic representation, there is an intentionally oxymoronic pairing put in its place. Hard to believe the VMs artist would have borrowed a little detail like the headband, then totally tanked on something as insignificant as the structure of the cosmos.
Other copies of the Aratea are even older. They may cover the same topics, but there are variations. Not every representation of the sun shows Apollo with a headband, but not all the evidence is available so far, especially for anything closer to the VMs dates.
Wikipedia articles on Apollo and Helios have a lot of interesting images - but there is a shortage of headbands there as well.
Another image in the Aratea is a diagram of the cosmos, a geocentric version showing the planets and their orbits, within a circle of the Zodiac. Not all versions have exactly the same structure, but the Leiden and St. Omer versions (with the headbands) have the same cosmic structure, one which shows Mercury and Venus as satellites in orbit around the sun, rather than the "standard" medieval model where all planetary spheres were concentric around the Earth.
Apparently, putting Mercury and Venus in orbit around the sun made the geocentric cosmic model more accurate. Now look at the VMs cosmos, in comparison with BNF Fr. 565 and Harley 334 illustrations. All the planets and their orbits are missing from this extremely simplified type of cosmic structure. Not only is there a loss of all planetary information in the VMs cosmic representation, there is an intentionally oxymoronic pairing put in its place. Hard to believe the VMs artist would have borrowed a little detail like the headband, then totally tanked on something as insignificant as the structure of the cosmos.