(05-05-2024, 07:09 PM)amelkin Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Evidences:
1. 5 parts were written by different people (Lisa Fagin Davis (2022, 2023))
2. 2 diagrams were duplicated by different people (f70v1, f71r, f71v, f72r)
Lisa Fagin Davis does NOT say the five (apparently) different sections were written by different people. Different folios within each section were written by different scribes. E.g. she suggests the Rosettes foldout was written by Scribe 1 and Scribe 4.
@Pepper is correct. In my published work, I have identified five scribal hands, but I never argued that the different sections were each written by different scribes. Just the opposite, in fact:
Herbal (including the herbal bifolia later in the manuscript): Scribes 1, 2, 3, and 5 (the work often - but not always - varies by bifolia, suggesting that the bifolia are out of order)
Astronomy/Astrology: Scribe 4
Balneology: Scribe 2
Rosette: Scribe 2 (text side) and Scribe 4 (diagram side)
Pharmaceutical: Scribe 1
Starred paragraphs: Scribe 3
See this document for details:
You are not allowed to view links.
Register or
Login to view.
i am not sure if the paper below was reported here, so I will copy the link.
You are not allowed to view links.
Register or
Login to view.
Johannes Hartlieb mentioned as a (possible) author.
(13-07-2024, 12:00 AM)zamolxe Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.i am not sure if the paper below was reported here, so I will copy the link.
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
Johannes Hartlieb mentioned as a (possible) author.
Hi, zamolxe:
Actually, we don’t say Hartlieb is a potential author but we do talk about how his attitudes may useful to predict those of the Voynich author(s).
Here is the string that discusses the underlying publication that this article is written about :
You are not allowed to view links.
Register or
Login to view.