The enlargement creates details that don't exist in the original. Nice but misleading: it looks as if the text was painted.
[
attachment=7548]
An interesting detail that also exists in the original: stroke 2 seems to encroach on stroke 1, as if they were written right to left. Or am I interpreting this incorrectly???
[
attachment=7549]
In fact, the zoom was to show the quality of rendering once the image in high resolution I know that zoom greenhouse has nothing to see an image in high resolution I put the link in page 4 to download
(25-08-2023, 09:25 PM)pegalac Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Let me know if the image quality is good You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
The image quality is stunning.
The ligature elements are clearly visible.
An attempt to cut out a fragment of the image was unsuccessful. I have a weak computer for such files.
I had to find a workaround.
You are not allowed to view links.
Register or
Login to view.
(26-08-2023, 11:30 AM)Hider Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. (25-08-2023, 09:25 PM)pegalac Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Let me know if the image quality is good You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
The image quality is stunning.
The ligature elements are clearly visible.
An attempt to cut out a fragment of the image was unsuccessful. I have a weak computer for such files.
I had to find a workaround.
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
I'm going to do the first 30 pages today if you're interested.
(26-08-2023, 11:37 AM)pegalac Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.I'm going to do the first 30 pages today if you're interested.
Yeah, that's interesting.
I would be very grateful for access to these files.
(26-08-2023, 10:50 AM)nablator Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.The enlargement creates details that don't exist in the original. Nice but misleading: it looks as if the text was painted.
An interesting detail that also exists in the original: stroke 2 seems to encroach on stroke 1, as if they were written right to left. Or am I interpreting this incorrectly???
Interesting what you noticed in the picture
I would advise caution with attempts like these. All we have is the pixels in the original image, which are already an approximation of 3D reality, taken under specific lighting conditions, variable flatness of the vellum etc. Doing further manipulations of these files will create and enlarge artifacts.
(26-08-2023, 12:19 PM)pegalac Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Interesting what you noticed in the picture
I never zoom so much; for reading it is useless, but it would be interesting to have [real] much higher resolution pics to be able to see clearly microscopic details that reveal the order of strokes. Some strokes were visibly You are not allowed to view links.
Register or
Login to view. on You are not allowed to view links.
Register or
Login to view. because they were too faint, this may also be the case here (second word of f1r).
The two best scans, side by side:
[
attachment=7550]
2004 is the one displayed by Jason Davies' viewer,
2014 is the one on archive.org, uploaded in 2019.
(26-08-2023, 12:27 PM)Koen G Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.I would advise caution with attempts like these. All we have is the pixels in the original image, which are already an approximation of 3D reality, taken under specific lighting conditions, variable flatness of the vellum etc. Doing further manipulations of these files will create and enlarge artifacts.
That's why I'm doing some tests to see what happens. If it doesn't work, I'm not going to continue.
(25-08-2023, 09:20 PM)pegalac Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.You actually need a really good computer with at least 128 RAM and a good 20GB graphics card to use ia for better image quality.
"ia" is some kind of software?