Thank you for the clarification, Wladimir!
I think I understand your point. Of course, there could be many speculative explanation for what you observe.
For instance, Q13A/B and the top of 116r discuss a similar subject (even if the Q13A/B have partially different illustrations and 116 no illustrations at all).
Or, as you say, the script is ambiguous (an abjad or highly abbreviated) causing a high number of homographs.
Something like your Histogram n.7 but for Q13 bifolios could help assess how close Q13A/B are according to your measures.
(25-01-2019, 02:47 PM)Linda Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Google translated version seems readable to me
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
Thanks, Linda!
I didn’t know that Google Translate could be used in this way!
I read the post, and for:
V(∩)ep 85r1=16,52%
Do you mean that 16.52% of lexicon of f85r1 could be found in epilogue (the last part of f116r)?
Hi Wladimir.
I see that you mean that 16.52% of lexicon of the epilogue could be found in f85r1.
It seems that we have different meanings for what “base” is.
(25-01-2019, 02:50 PM)Wladimir D Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. (25-01-2019, 02:11 PM)Davidsch Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.May i ask what your idea and/or purpose is of publication of these results and this research is,
and what kind of feedback do you like to receive?
The purpose of the publication is to narrow down the variants of the approach to deciphering VMS, since it is possible to completely eliminate the use of a simple replacement substitution cipher.
Demonstrate once again the proposed “Volume of overlapping information” method, and when the community recognizes its effectiveness, adopt and automate it.
I still have hope for the sensible text of Herbal A and Recipes with banks, otherwise there was no need to copy 1: 1 simplified drawings in the section of containers.
Ok, then I am correct you are demonstrating and not asking for anything.
But, you can never satisfy the "common" vms-interested amateur that likes to think in layman terms.
Although I agree, that letter substitution can not be the (simple) solution.
In my experience you can never convince them that a "simple letter substitution is impossible" by complex graphs or methods.