27-01-2019, 06:59 PM
(27-01-2019, 06:23 PM)doranchak Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Ah, ok - well in case someone wants TIFs with the same file names as the original SIDs, my mirror is here:XnView decompresses the SIDs slightly differently. Very small differences: not more than one bit on each color channel, resulting in 2^3 = 8 colors in the difference. A rounding-off issue, not random, maybe a floating-point multiplication by 255 instead of 256.
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
Copies of the command line utilities for converting SID images are here:
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
On the other hand the uncompressed TIFs on the Beinecke website are much closer to their JPEGs than to the SIDs. Even to the naked eye the SIDs (and your uncompressed TIFs of course) show more detail than the images at You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
Did they use a different source (if not the SIDs, then what?) or did they apply a smoothing filter (unlikely)? It is also possible that these details on the pixel level were produced by a stronger sharpening at decompression both by XnView and the GeoExpress utility, compared to whatever conversion utility the Beinecke library used.