06-11-2018, 03:44 PM
I want to start this thread because the subject doesn't fit any of the present forums, and a library entry doesn't allow cumulative addition by the poster - which I hope to do.
The theme is really Methodology and non-Voynich academic works that can help us gauge objectively whether on hypothesis (or 'theory') deserves greater or less weight given it. A sort of 'reality-checking' bibliography for all the non-cipher and non-linguistic aspects of Voynich studies:
No. 1. 'Reality checking' theories of where the manuscript was manufactured:
For 'Italian' theories see the excellent article by Priscilla Anderson from the Journal of the American Institute for Conservation.
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
and for the full list of that Journal's articles:
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
The theme is really Methodology and non-Voynich academic works that can help us gauge objectively whether on hypothesis (or 'theory') deserves greater or less weight given it. A sort of 'reality-checking' bibliography for all the non-cipher and non-linguistic aspects of Voynich studies:
No. 1. 'Reality checking' theories of where the manuscript was manufactured:
For 'Italian' theories see the excellent article by Priscilla Anderson from the Journal of the American Institute for Conservation.
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
and for the full list of that Journal's articles:
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.