(06-08-2019, 05:08 PM)Gavin Güldenpfennig Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.I´m quite sure, that the plant on folio 2v is a Nymphaea Alba.
I'm probably equally sure that it is
Menyanthese/Villarsia, not
Nymphaea Alba. The Menyanthese/Villarsia water lilies (sometimes called frogbit) are smaller than the ones most people are familiar with. They come in white and yellow and both fringed and unfringed and they have a little V-shape on the petals (as in the VMS drawing).
They are circumboreal and they are sometimes included in medieval herbal texts. Some of them have an extended pistil (as in the VMS drawing). So the flower, the pistil, and the shape of the leaf of the Menyanthese/Villarsia species (there are several varieties) are much more similar to the VMS drawing than
Nymphaea alba.
Quote:Following the german author Peter Roitzsch, folio 9v gives us a three- coloured pansy (viola tricolor).
Most people seem to think this Viola tricolor (including me). I think there's a small possibilibity it might also be one of the other two violas that is very similar (so similar they are hard to tell apart), but there's not much controversy about this plant ID because it looks exactly like Viola tricolor, right down to the shape and placement of the palmate leaves.
Quote:Furthermore, with the help of some German researchers, I found out, that a kind of plantain could be painted on the folio 25v. The five veins of the leafs are very significant.
But my first interpretation of this plant was, that it is basil, because of the little dragon on the root of the plant. I interpreted this as a basilisk.
So, I´m not sure about this.
I think it's
probably Plantago, but it's not 100% certain because there are three or four other parallel-veined plants on my list that have rosette-arranged leaves. The VMS plant has no flower-stalks to help us distinguish between several plants that have this shape and arrangement of leaves.
I think it's unlikely that it is basil because the veins are wrong, the shape of the leaves is wrong, and the arrangement of the leaves is wrong. Dragons were associated with quite a few different plants in medieval manuscripts, not just basil. Plus the dragon doesn't look very much like a basilisk, it looks more like some of the other medieval dragons.
Quote:For the folio 26r I have indications, that it could be a vervain.
I'm sorry, but the leaves and flowers are completely wrong for vervain. Most medieval vervain drawings are recognizable.
Plant 26r looks more like Kalanchoe (note the leaves), some species of Umbilicus, maybe
Dracocephalum grandiflorum, or
Chiastophyllum oppositifolium (lamb's tail, originally called Umbilicus).
Both the flowers and the leaves are a pretty good match for
Chiastophyllum oppositifolium, a plant that originated in the Caucasus. It's not an ID I've seen mentioned by other Voynich researchers, I'm a lone wolf on this one, but if you can find a picture of the ones that grow wild in the mountains (they are not as thick and droopy as the ones that have been domesticated) you'll see what I mean. The wild ones are sparser than the ones that have been bred by gardeners to have thicker, longer tassels.
You are not allowed to view links.
Register or
Login to view.
When they are young, when the leaves first come out, the leaves are rounder. The same is true for
Sedum telephium, which starts out with rounder, more oval leaves, which become more elliptical as the plant grows (Sedum telephium also has bumpy leaf edges).
Quote:The biggest finding could be the plant on folio 23v. I have the suspicion, that it could be borage.
The initial word of the page is transcripted by me as "boeairroja". The spanish word for borage is "borraja".
As far as the possibility stands that "oeai" could be a case of a - in German so called - "Rhenish distension", you could read it as "ua". So you could read the word also as "boarroja" or "buarroja".
The flower and shape and leaves of VMS 23v do not look like borage. Not at all. Other medieval illustrators drew borage in a way that is quite recognizable so why would the VMS illustrator draw it completely wrong when it is evident from other drawings that the illustrator was familiar with plants and could draw them fairly accurately?
Look at the rounded leaves and the pattern on the leaf (look closely at the leaves). Look at the flower. Not at all like borage. I am not sure what it is, I have six possibilities on my list for this plant, but if it is a drawing of borage, it is a very bad drawing.
Quote:I would like to discuss my ideas. Please share your opinion.
That's my opinion.

You might not like it, but there it is.
I have a passion for plants, it was what drew me to the VMS, and I am actually quite impressed with how some of them are drawn. I don't think they are all naturalistic, I think there are mnemonics in some of them, and there might be story-telling in others (we're still exploring this), but the ones that are naturalistic are quite well-drawn for their time.