19-03-2017, 02:09 PM
Hi everyone,
Looking at 82r the other day, I noticed a line I hadn't seen before:
![[Image: image.jpg?q=f82r-480-1732-243-212]](https://voynich.ninja/extractor/image.jpg?q=f82r-480-1732-243-212)
The reason this grabbed my attention is because this line seems to be some remnant of a former plan for the page, which would have been erased. Could the vertical line originally have been through the whole page?
Interestingly, at the top of the page there are two "arches", and if we consider all these elements together, I wonder if the original plan for the page may have been a two column text, nestled under two arches, as can be seen in many medieval manuscripts' layout. (the following is just a lazy grab from a quick Google search, I'm not trying to say it matches this one, but just to give an illustration of the type of layout I'm referring to):
Glasgow MS Hunter 475, 12th C Sicily, 21v-22r.
I'm curious to know what others think: Could this page have been meant to be designed differently? Could the creator of the Voynich have betrayed the fact that this page was inspired by a manuscript where the layout was in a two-column format with arches at the top?
Looking at 82r the other day, I noticed a line I hadn't seen before:
![[Image: image.jpg?q=f82r-480-1732-243-212]](https://voynich.ninja/extractor/image.jpg?q=f82r-480-1732-243-212)
The reason this grabbed my attention is because this line seems to be some remnant of a former plan for the page, which would have been erased. Could the vertical line originally have been through the whole page?
Interestingly, at the top of the page there are two "arches", and if we consider all these elements together, I wonder if the original plan for the page may have been a two column text, nestled under two arches, as can be seen in many medieval manuscripts' layout. (the following is just a lazy grab from a quick Google search, I'm not trying to say it matches this one, but just to give an illustration of the type of layout I'm referring to):
![[Image: H475_canontables.jpg]](http://special.lib.gla.ac.uk/images/exhibitions/month/H475/H475_canontables.jpg)
I'm curious to know what others think: Could this page have been meant to be designed differently? Could the creator of the Voynich have betrayed the fact that this page was inspired by a manuscript where the layout was in a two-column format with arches at the top?